Factors Influencing Female Patients’ Selection of Care Through Women’s Sports Medicine Programs

BACKGROUND: To describe physician- and clinic-specific factors that may influence female patients’ selection of care in a multidisciplinary women’s sports medicine program. METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was distributed to female patients evaluated by female physicians in a women’s sports medicine clinic over a 2-month time period. Patient demographics, referral sources, influence of physician gender on selection of physician (1-7 Likert scale), and potential contributing factors (binary scale) were recorded. Patient interest in various ancillary multidisciplinary services (each on a binary scale, as below) were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 178 female patients (mean age 44.3 +/- 16.6 years) were included in this study. Patients reported 5.4 +/- 4.8 hours of weekly exercise. Physician selection was moderately influenced by a physician’s female sex (4.2 +/- 2.2; 1 being “not influential”, 7 being “most influential”). 75.3% noted some preference (> 1), and 35.3% noted strong preference (6 or 7) for a female physician, with 20.6% reporting female physician sex as the most influential factor in their selection (7). Among self-referred patients, female physician sex played a stronger influence on selection than those referred from other sources (5.3 vs 3.9, p<0.001) with 59.5% reporting strong preference. The most frequently cited reason was “I feel more comfortable with a female physician” (52.0%). Nearly 80% of patients requested access ancillary services, including injury prevention training (50.0%), exercise counseling (48.9%), nutrition counseling (35.4%), sleep specialists (16.9%), hormonal specialists (16.3%), sports psychology (7.3%), and sports cardiology (4.5%). Younger patients (< 40 years) more frequently requested sports psychology compared to older patients (40+ years) (12.2% vs 3.1%, respectively; p=0.020). CONCLUSION: Female patients who were evaluated by female sports medicine physicians in the women’s sports medicine program frequently cited physician sex as a contributing factor in their selection, more so among patients who were self-referred. The majority of patients were interested in access to at least one ancillary service, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary sports medicine care in women’s sports medicine programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Women s Sports Medicine
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53646/ghdmmy93
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Female Patients’ Selection of Care Through Women’s Sports Medicine Programs

Kelly C. McInnis, Stephanie DeLuca, Haylee Borgstrom, Miho J. Tanaka
Journal of Women s Sports Medicine
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Factors Influencing Female Patients’ Selection of Care Through Women’s Sports Medicine Programs

Kelly C. McInnis, Stephanie DeLuca, Haylee Borgstrom, Miho J. Tanaka
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To describe physician- and clinic-specific factors that may influence female patients’ selection of care in a multidisciplinary women’s sports medicine program. METHODS: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was distributed to female patients evaluated by female physicians in a women’s sports medicine clinic over a 2-month time period. Patient demographics, referral sources, influence of physician gender on selection of physician (1-7 Likert scale), and potential contributing factors (binary scale) were recorded. Patient interest in various ancillary multidisciplinary services (each on a binary scale, as below) were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 178 female patients (mean age 44.3 +/- 16.6 years) were included in this study. Patients reported 5.4 +/- 4.8 hours of weekly exercise. Physician selection was moderately influenced by a physician’s female sex (4.2 +/- 2.2; 1 being “not influential”, 7 being “most influential”). 75.3% noted some preference (> 1), and 35.3% noted strong preference (6 or 7) for a female physician, with 20.6% reporting female physician sex as the most influential factor in their selection (7). Among self-referred patients, female physician sex played a stronger influence on selection than those referred from other sources (5.3 vs 3.9, p<0.001) with 59.5% reporting strong preference. The most frequently cited reason was “I feel more comfortable with a female physician” (52.0%). Nearly 80% of patients requested access ancillary services, including injury prevention training (50.0%), exercise counseling (48.9%), nutrition counseling (35.4%), sleep specialists (16.9%), hormonal specialists (16.3%), sports psychology (7.3%), and sports cardiology (4.5%). Younger patients (< 40 years) more frequently requested sports psychology compared to older patients (40+ years) (12.2% vs 3.1%, respectively; p=0.020). CONCLUSION: Female patients who were evaluated by female sports medicine physicians in the women’s sports medicine program frequently cited physician sex as a contributing factor in their selection, more so among patients who were self-referred. The majority of patients were interested in access to at least one ancillary service, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary sports medicine care in women’s sports medicine programs.

Journal of Women s Sports MedicineVol. 5(1)
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.