Validation of the Prognostic Ability of Eight Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Events in NSTEMI Patients with Multi-Vessel Disease

This study compared eight risk scores regarding their predictive ability in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients (<i>n</i> = 862) with multi-vessel disease (MVD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary outcome was cardiac death. The secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned repeat revascularization], all-cause death, and MI. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 47 (5.5%) cardiac death, 218 (25.3%) MACE, 79 (9.2%) all-cause death, and 40 (4.6%) MI were recorded. The Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score II was the most accurate for cardiac death with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.814, 95% CI: 0.758-0.869). The logistic SYNTAX score extended model (LSS<sub>extended</sub>) exhibited the most powerful ability in predicting MACE (AUC: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.580-0.667) and MI (AUC: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.567-0.747). The modified Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction score (MAS) was the most accurate score in predicting all-cause death (AUC: 0.798, 95% CI: 0.752-0.844). The scores involving clinical variables showed better ability to predict adverse cardiovascular events among NSTEMI patients with MVD after PCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angiology
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197251314638
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Prognostic Ability of Eight Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Events in NSTEMI Patients with Multi-Vessel Disease

T. Q. Wang, Rongdi Xu, Jiachun Lang, Le Wang et al.
1 citations
Angiology
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
1.39
article

Validation of the Prognostic Ability of Eight Risk Scores for Cardiovascular Events in NSTEMI Patients with Multi-Vessel Disease

T. Q. Wang, Rongdi Xu, Jiachun Lang, Le Wang, Yuecheng Hu, Hongliang Cong, Chen Wang, Jiao He, Jingxia Zhang, Jikun Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compared eight risk scores regarding their predictive ability in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients (<i>n</i> = 862) with multi-vessel disease (MVD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary outcome was cardiac death. The secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) [a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned repeat revascularization], all-cause death, and MI. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 47 (5.5%) cardiac death, 218 (25.3%) MACE, 79 (9.2%) all-cause death, and 40 (4.6%) MI were recorded. The Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score II was the most accurate for cardiac death with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.814, 95% CI: 0.758-0.869). The logistic SYNTAX score extended model (LSS<sub>extended</sub>) exhibited the most powerful ability in predicting MACE (AUC: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.580-0.667) and MI (AUC: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.567-0.747). The modified Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction score (MAS) was the most accurate score in predicting all-cause death (AUC: 0.798, 95% CI: 0.752-0.844). The scores involving clinical variables showed better ability to predict adverse cardiovascular events among NSTEMI patients with MVD after PCI.

Angiology
Tianjin University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai First People's Hospital (CN), Tianjin Chest Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.