Mixed methods study of views and experience of non-hospitalised individuals with long COVID of using pacing interventions

Long COVID is highly prevalent and debilitating, with key symptoms including fatigue, breathlessness, and brain fog. Pacing is an approach to energy conservation used to help people with chronic conditions like ME/CFS manage the impact of their condition, and could be a useful strategy for people with Long COVID. The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of non-hospitalised adults with Long COVID of pacing as an intervention. This mixed methods study is part of the Therapies for Long COVID (TLC) Feasibility trial. A feasibility questionnaire was developed for participants. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of participants at the end of the study and these interviews were analysed using the reflexive thematic analysis approach. 28 participants completed the feasibility questionnaire and 19 participants took part in a qualitative interview. Participants found that pacing helped improve motivation and activity planning. Concerns included challenges due to time constraints, complexity of the intervention, and limited instructions. Pacing for Long COVID may offer potential benefits and is feasible but further research is required to demonstrate its benefits. Overall, research on pacing in the context of Long COVID has the potential to enhance our understanding of symptom management and rehabilitation strategies for this emerging population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96319-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed methods study of views and experience of non-hospitalised individuals with long COVID of using pacing interventions

Shamil Haroon, Christel McMullan, Elin Haf Davies, Sarah Hughes et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
1.39
article

Mixed methods study of views and experience of non-hospitalised individuals with long COVID of using pacing interventions

Shamil Haroon, Christel McMullan, Elin Haf Davies, Sarah Hughes, Sarah Elizabeth Flanagan, Felicity Jeyes, Amy Chong, Yvonne Alder, Louise Jackson, Naijie Guan, Grace Turner, Lewis Buckland, Melanie Calvert, Chris Frost, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Anuradhaa Subramanian, Krish Nirantharakumar, David Stanton
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Long COVID is highly prevalent and debilitating, with key symptoms including fatigue, breathlessness, and brain fog. Pacing is an approach to energy conservation used to help people with chronic conditions like ME/CFS manage the impact of their condition, and could be a useful strategy for people with Long COVID. The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of non-hospitalised adults with Long COVID of pacing as an intervention. This mixed methods study is part of the Therapies for Long COVID (TLC) Feasibility trial. A feasibility questionnaire was developed for participants. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of participants at the end of the study and these interviews were analysed using the reflexive thematic analysis approach. 28 participants completed the feasibility questionnaire and 19 participants took part in a qualitative interview. Participants found that pacing helped improve motivation and activity planning. Concerns included challenges due to time constraints, complexity of the intervention, and limited instructions. Pacing for Long COVID may offer potential benefits and is feasible but further research is required to demonstrate its benefits. Overall, research on pacing in the context of Long COVID has the potential to enhance our understanding of symptom management and rehabilitation strategies for this emerging population.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Cellular Therapeutics (United Kingdom) (GB), NIHR Research Delivery Network (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.