Multimodal Analysis of Stories Told by Mental Health Influencers on TikTok

Twelve young people with lived experience of mental health challenges, aged between 16 and 25, were recruited through The McPin Foundation to form the young people's advisory group (YPAG) for the project. This age range incorporates adolescents and 'emerging adults' who are likely to experience a range of life transitions and encounter challenges in mental health. The group met remotely four times during the study, helping to define the categories of influencers, refining the narrative categories and visual formats for the code book and discussing data examples openly to guide the analysis. Two members of the YPAG were trained and participated as coders in the inter-rater reliability process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70226
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal Analysis of Stories Told by Mental Health Influencers on TikTok

Shioma‐Lei Craythorne, Alex Christiansen, Michael Larkin, Ruth Page et al.
11 citations
Health Expectations
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
46.22
article

Multimodal Analysis of Stories Told by Mental Health Influencers on TikTok

Shioma‐Lei Craythorne, Alex Christiansen, Michael Larkin, Ruth Page, Paul Crawford, Aalok Gohil, Spencer Strutt
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Twelve young people with lived experience of mental health challenges, aged between 16 and 25, were recruited through The McPin Foundation to form the young people's advisory group (YPAG) for the project. This age range incorporates adolescents and 'emerging adults' who are likely to experience a range of life transitions and encounter challenges in mental health. The group met remotely four times during the study, helping to define the categories of influencers, refining the narrative categories and visual formats for the code book and discussing data examples openly to guide the analysis. Two members of the YPAG were trained and participated as coders in the inter-rater reliability process.

Health ExpectationsVol. 28(3)
University of Nottingham (GB), Aston University (GB), McPin Foundation (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
46.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.