Documenting Footprints for Tracksites at Dinosaur State Park, Rocky Hill, Connecticut

Tracksites at Dinosaur State Park were first mapped soon after discovery (East Tracksite, ca. 1966) and more than a decade later (West Tracksite, 1980–1981) using near-vertical low-level photographs and hand-traced footprint outlines. Associated photomosaic images/maps on display at the park are thorough but lack topographic detail. We summarize our use of laser scanning, image capture, and digital photogrammetry workflow to map, model, measure, and visualize the East Tracksite (535 m2) and the West Tracksite (335 m2). The East Tracksite, buried since circa 1978, is modeled from 54 historical photographs (ca. 1969) with limited success. Only covering 67% of the tracksite, this model is topographically noisy and is not suitable for detailed topographic measurement due to lower image quality, limited image overlap, and the absence of independent topographic control. In contrast, the West Tracksite models in great detail and includes 751 mostly Eubrontes prints, 89 “swim” traces, other unusual structures, and micro-topographic variations for the three primary host sedimentary layers (lowermost wave-rippled L0, overlain by L1, and wave-rippled L2). Traces are most numerous on L1 (approximately 50% of Eubrontes, nearly all “swim” prints, and one of two varieties of enigmatic structures). Unidentified structures include double-imprinted 0.5–1.5 m–long curved and segmented grooves on L0, and an approximately 2.3 m–long series of alternating oval impressions on L1. Trackways with six or more prints reveal several groups with similar but widely distributed orientations. Footprints within individual trackways are deeper, larger, and more voluminous on L0 than on L1 and/or L2, which may imply more easily deformed L0 sediments, although L1 and/or L2 tracks often are partially sediment-filled thereby diminishing track depths and volumes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3374/014.066.0106
Citations
6
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documenting Footprints for Tracksites at Dinosaur State Park, Rocky Hill, Connecticut

Patrick R. Getty, Peter M. Galton, James O. Farlow, James A. Hyatt
6 citations
Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
14.08
article

Documenting Footprints for Tracksites at Dinosaur State Park, Rocky Hill, Connecticut

Patrick R. Getty, Peter M. Galton, James O. Farlow, James A. Hyatt
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Tracksites at Dinosaur State Park were first mapped soon after discovery (East Tracksite, ca. 1966) and more than a decade later (West Tracksite, 1980–1981) using near-vertical low-level photographs and hand-traced footprint outlines. Associated photomosaic images/maps on display at the park are thorough but lack topographic detail. We summarize our use of laser scanning, image capture, and digital photogrammetry workflow to map, model, measure, and visualize the East Tracksite (535 m2) and the West Tracksite (335 m2). The East Tracksite, buried since circa 1978, is modeled from 54 historical photographs (ca. 1969) with limited success. Only covering 67% of the tracksite, this model is topographically noisy and is not suitable for detailed topographic measurement due to lower image quality, limited image overlap, and the absence of independent topographic control. In contrast, the West Tracksite models in great detail and includes 751 mostly Eubrontes prints, 89 “swim” traces, other unusual structures, and micro-topographic variations for the three primary host sedimentary layers (lowermost wave-rippled L0, overlain by L1, and wave-rippled L2). Traces are most numerous on L1 (approximately 50% of Eubrontes, nearly all “swim” prints, and one of two varieties of enigmatic structures). Unidentified structures include double-imprinted 0.5–1.5 m–long curved and segmented grooves on L0, and an approximately 2.3 m–long series of alternating oval impressions on L1. Trackways with six or more prints reveal several groups with similar but widely distributed orientations. Footprints within individual trackways are deeper, larger, and more voluminous on L0 than on L1 and/or L2, which may imply more easily deformed L0 sediments, although L1 and/or L2 tracks often are partially sediment-filled thereby diminishing track depths and volumes.

Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural HistoryVol. 66(1)
American Museum of Natural History (US), University of Bridgeport (US), Yale Peabody Museum, Collin College (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
14.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.