The journalistic understanding of science as process and social system: A qualitative exploration in the German science journalism community

While surveys on public understandings of science are common, little is known about how science and its processes are perceived and reported by journalists. However, knowledge about processual aspects of science is crucial when estimating the trustworthiness of experts and levels of evidence. Science journalists function not only as translators but also as critical observers of science, shaping the overall picture of science and ideally strengthening the public's judgment. To unfold the shape of such process-oriented science journalism, we investigate the understanding of science in the German science journalism community in the aftermath of COVID-19. We find an advanced understanding of scientific processes among participants of five focus group discussions and a preceding survey. The science journalists show a high level of general trust in scientific institutions and see informing and contextualizing as their main professional tasks. Some emphasis on quantitative studies and some reservations about politicized science and certain disciplines become visible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Understanding of Science
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251326508
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The journalistic understanding of science as process and social system: A qualitative exploration in the German science journalism community

Frauke Domgörgen, David Kaldewey, Pascal Berger, Tobias Kreutzer et al.
1 citations
Public Understanding of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
article

The journalistic understanding of science as process and social system: A qualitative exploration in the German science journalism community

Frauke Domgörgen, David Kaldewey, Pascal Berger, Tobias Kreutzer, Holger Wormer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While surveys on public understandings of science are common, little is known about how science and its processes are perceived and reported by journalists. However, knowledge about processual aspects of science is crucial when estimating the trustworthiness of experts and levels of evidence. Science journalists function not only as translators but also as critical observers of science, shaping the overall picture of science and ideally strengthening the public's judgment. To unfold the shape of such process-oriented science journalism, we investigate the understanding of science in the German science journalism community in the aftermath of COVID-19. We find an advanced understanding of scientific processes among participants of five focus group discussions and a preceding survey. The science journalists show a high level of general trust in scientific institutions and see informing and contextualizing as their main professional tasks. Some emphasis on quantitative studies and some reservations about politicized science and certain disciplines become visible.

Public Understanding of ScienceVol. 34(7)
University of Bonn (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE)
Volkswagen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.