Where law meets data: a practical guide to expert coding in legal research

Abstract The rise of empirical methods has had a polarising effect on legal studies in Europe. On the one hand, quantitative empiricists have frequently dismissed traditional doctrinal scholarship as unscientific and its insights as unreliable. On the other hand, many doctrinal scholars are apprehensive about the perceived displacement of domain expertise from legal research caused by the empirical turn. To bridge the gap between the two camps and address their respective concerns, we propose a wider adoption of expert coding as a methodology for legal research. Expert coding is a method for systematic parsing and representation of phenomena such as legal principles in a structured form, using researchers’ subject matter expertise. To facilitate the uptake of expert coding, we provide a step-by-step guide that addresses not only the coding process but also fundamental prerequisites such as conceptualisation, operationalisation and document selection. We argue that this methodological framework leverages legal scholars’ expertise in a more impactful way than traditional doctrinal analyses. We illustrate each step and methodological principle with examples from European Union law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Law Open
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2024.23
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where law meets data: a practical guide to expert coding in legal research

Michal Ovádek, Jan Zglinski, Philipp A Schroeder
2 citations
European Law Open
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
8.15
article

Where law meets data: a practical guide to expert coding in legal research

Michal Ovádek, Jan Zglinski, Philipp A Schroeder
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rise of empirical methods has had a polarising effect on legal studies in Europe. On the one hand, quantitative empiricists have frequently dismissed traditional doctrinal scholarship as unscientific and its insights as unreliable. On the other hand, many doctrinal scholars are apprehensive about the perceived displacement of domain expertise from legal research caused by the empirical turn. To bridge the gap between the two camps and address their respective concerns, we propose a wider adoption of expert coding as a methodology for legal research. Expert coding is a method for systematic parsing and representation of phenomena such as legal principles in a structured form, using researchers’ subject matter expertise. To facilitate the uptake of expert coding, we provide a step-by-step guide that addresses not only the coding process but also fundamental prerequisites such as conceptualisation, operationalisation and document selection. We argue that this methodological framework leverages legal scholars’ expertise in a more impactful way than traditional doctrinal analyses. We illustrate each step and methodological principle with examples from European Union law.

European Law OpenVol. 3(4)
LMU Klinikum (DE), University College London (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
8.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where law meets data: a practical guide to expert coding in legal research — Michal Ovádek, Jan Zglinski, et al. · European Law Open (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS