Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

Abstract While engaged anthropology foregrounds the privilege and ethical responsibility of researchers toward interlocutors suffering all forms of oppression, anthropologists' own vulnerabilities and troubling experiences of violence tend to be ignored and silenced. This silencing is due to the prevailing heroic image of the politically engaged anthropologist, despite longstanding critiques from feminist and decolonial scholarship. In this article, I discuss my witnessing of the violent death of an interlocutor in Pakistan‐controlled Kashmir. I propose to think of vulnerabilities as diverse yet shared human experiences to explore the epistemological and political potential of researchers' vulnerabilities for understanding and practicing solidarities in ethnographic fieldwork. Building on the perspective of “ordinary ethics,” I focus on the everyday exchanges of care and support that can emerge from the intricate entanglements of anthropologists' exposure to violence with the vulnerabilities and struggles of the people with whom they work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropology & Humanism
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anhu.70012
Citations
3
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

Pascale Schild
3 citations
Anthropology & Humanism
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
25.57
article

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics

Pascale Schild
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract While engaged anthropology foregrounds the privilege and ethical responsibility of researchers toward interlocutors suffering all forms of oppression, anthropologists' own vulnerabilities and troubling experiences of violence tend to be ignored and silenced. This silencing is due to the prevailing heroic image of the politically engaged anthropologist, despite longstanding critiques from feminist and decolonial scholarship. In this article, I discuss my witnessing of the violent death of an interlocutor in Pakistan‐controlled Kashmir. I propose to think of vulnerabilities as diverse yet shared human experiences to explore the epistemological and political potential of researchers' vulnerabilities for understanding and practicing solidarities in ethnographic fieldwork. Building on the perspective of “ordinary ethics,” I focus on the everyday exchanges of care and support that can emerge from the intricate entanglements of anthropologists' exposure to violence with the vulnerabilities and struggles of the people with whom they work.

Anthropology & HumanismVol. 50(1)
University of Bern (CH), University of Basel (CH)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sharing vulnerabilities: Rethinking privilege and solidarities in anthropology from the perspective of ordinary ethics — Pascale Schild · Anthropology & Humanism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS