Fair Use in AI Data Training: Judgment Criteria and Balancing Mechanisms

Against the backdrop of the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the issue of fair use in AI data training has sparked widespread attention and discussion. Large model training relies on massive amounts of data, whose technical characteristics differ significantly from how traditional works are used. However, market failures are prevalent, with high licensing costs and difficulties in obtaining rights holders' permissions hindering the effective operation of traditional authorization mechanisms. Therefore, the use of works in large-scale model training should be considered as fair use, since it has a limited impact on the legitimate rights of copyright holders while offering significant social and public benefits. In addition, within the framework of copyright law, it is essential to clarify the rules and criteria for fair use in machine learning and to define the obligations and responsibilities of AI data trainers. This will help balance the interests of copyright holders, society, and data trainers, thereby promoting the healthy and sustainable development of AI technology and the adaptive evolution of copyright law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Natural Science
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2025.ch22295
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fair Use in AI Data Training: Judgment Criteria and Balancing Mechanisms

Yong Ding
Theoretical and Natural Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Fair Use in AI Data Training: Judgment Criteria and Balancing Mechanisms

Yong Ding
article en

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the issue of fair use in AI data training has sparked widespread attention and discussion. Large model training relies on massive amounts of data, whose technical characteristics differ significantly from how traditional works are used. However, market failures are prevalent, with high licensing costs and difficulties in obtaining rights holders' permissions hindering the effective operation of traditional authorization mechanisms. Therefore, the use of works in large-scale model training should be considered as fair use, since it has a limited impact on the legitimate rights of copyright holders while offering significant social and public benefits. In addition, within the framework of copyright law, it is essential to clarify the rules and criteria for fair use in machine learning and to define the obligations and responsibilities of AI data trainers. This will help balance the interests of copyright holders, society, and data trainers, thereby promoting the healthy and sustainable development of AI technology and the adaptive evolution of copyright law.

Theoretical and Natural ScienceVol. 101(1)
Institute of Foreign Languages (RU), Heilongjiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.