Early detection and analysis of accurate breast cancer for improved diagnosis using deep supervised learning for enhanced patient outcomes

Early detection of breast cancer (BC) is essential for effective treatment and improved prognosis. This study compares the performance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVMs), and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), on two key datasets, Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) and Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification (BreaKHis). For the BreaKHis dataset, the CNN achieved an impressive accuracy of 92%, with precision, recall, and F1 score values of 91%, 93%, and 91%, respectively. In contrast, LR achieved 88% accuracy, with corresponding precision, recall, and F1 score values of 86%, 87%, and 89%, respectively. SVM and GNB demonstrated 90% and 84% accuracy, respectively, with similar precision, recall, and F1-score metric performances. In the WDBC dataset, LR achieved the highest accuracy of 97.5%, with nearly 97% values for precision, recall, and F1 score. In contrast, CNN attained 96% accuracy with equal recall, precision, and F1 score values of 96%. SVM and GNB followed closely with 95% and 94% accuracy, respectively. Minimising the false negative rate (FNR) and false omission rate (FOR) is vital for improving model reliability, with the LR excelling in the WDBC dataset (FNR: 5.9%, FOR: 4.8%) and the CNN performing best in the BreaKHis dataset (FNR: 8.3%, FOR: 7.0%). The results demonstrate that CNN outperforms traditional models across both datasets, highlighting its potential for early and accurate BC detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2784
Citations
8
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early detection and analysis of accurate breast cancer for improved diagnosis using deep supervised learning for enhanced patient outcomes

Ruiling Feng, Sabir Khan, Mohamed Mohany, Muhammad Shafiq et al.
8 citations
PeerJ Computer Science
AI in cancer detection
19.85
article

Early detection and analysis of accurate breast cancer for improved diagnosis using deep supervised learning for enhanced patient outcomes

Ruiling Feng, Sabir Khan, Mohamed Mohany, Muhammad Shafiq, Imran Zafar, Samra Babar, Mandika Chetry, Najeeb Ullah Khan, Imran Ali, Hao Sun, Hassan Imran Afridi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Early detection of breast cancer (BC) is essential for effective treatment and improved prognosis. This study compares the performance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVMs), and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), on two key datasets, Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) and Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification (BreaKHis). For the BreaKHis dataset, the CNN achieved an impressive accuracy of 92%, with precision, recall, and F1 score values of 91%, 93%, and 91%, respectively. In contrast, LR achieved 88% accuracy, with corresponding precision, recall, and F1 score values of 86%, 87%, and 89%, respectively. SVM and GNB demonstrated 90% and 84% accuracy, respectively, with similar precision, recall, and F1-score metric performances. In the WDBC dataset, LR achieved the highest accuracy of 97.5%, with nearly 97% values for precision, recall, and F1 score. In contrast, CNN attained 96% accuracy with equal recall, precision, and F1 score values of 96%. SVM and GNB followed closely with 95% and 94% accuracy, respectively. Minimising the false negative rate (FNR) and false omission rate (FOR) is vital for improving model reliability, with the LR excelling in the WDBC dataset (FNR: 5.9%, FOR: 4.8%) and the CNN performing best in the BreaKHis dataset (FNR: 8.3%, FOR: 7.0%). The results demonstrate that CNN outperforms traditional models across both datasets, highlighting its potential for early and accurate BC detection.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 11
Quaid-i-Azam University (PK), University of Sindh (PK), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar (PK), King Saud University (SA), Shantou University (CN), Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (IN), The First People's Hospital of Shunde (CN), National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry (PK), Shantou University Medical College (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN), University of Faisalabad (PK), Southern Medical University (CN), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
AI in cancer detection
19.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.