Does the housing provident fund cause housing inequality? The micromechanism and macroeffect in China

Abstract This study explores the housing distribution effect of the Housing Provident Fund (HPF) system on households. Utilizing data from the China Household Finance Survey conducted in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019, this study empirically investigates this effect from two dimensions: the impact of HPF payments on household income and housing loan behavior, and the impact on the Gini coefficient of housing assets within the group. The results indicate that the HPF payment does not significantly impact household income levels. Instead, it increases their likelihood of obtaining housing loans, particularly for middle-income households. Additionally, for any group of families, the HPF payment decreased the housing Gini coefficient among households by approximately 0.11 units. This study may be the first to provide the most direct empirical evidence on the extent of HPF’s impact on housing inequality within a group. It also questions the inference in the literature that “HPF will aggravate housing inequality within the group.” Based on this study’s findings, we expect that housing inequality will continue to be alleviated with continued HPF implementation. In particular, this effect will be more significant if the credit support for low-income families to purchase houses through the HPF can be further enhanced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Innovation
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-025-00778-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the housing provident fund cause housing inequality? The micromechanism and macroeffect in China

Anquan Zhang, Lu Liu
2 citations
Financial Innovation
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
8.40
article

Does the housing provident fund cause housing inequality? The micromechanism and macroeffect in China

Anquan Zhang, Lu Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the housing distribution effect of the Housing Provident Fund (HPF) system on households. Utilizing data from the China Household Finance Survey conducted in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019, this study empirically investigates this effect from two dimensions: the impact of HPF payments on household income and housing loan behavior, and the impact on the Gini coefficient of housing assets within the group. The results indicate that the HPF payment does not significantly impact household income levels. Instead, it increases their likelihood of obtaining housing loans, particularly for middle-income households. Additionally, for any group of families, the HPF payment decreased the housing Gini coefficient among households by approximately 0.11 units. This study may be the first to provide the most direct empirical evidence on the extent of HPF’s impact on housing inequality within a group. It also questions the inference in the literature that “HPF will aggravate housing inequality within the group.” Based on this study’s findings, we expect that housing inequality will continue to be alleviated with continued HPF implementation. In particular, this effect will be more significant if the credit support for low-income families to purchase houses through the HPF can be further enhanced.

Financial InnovationVol. 11(1)
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.