Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment

The authors present chess players’ problem-solving in a three-move experiment. 16 advanced chess players, both men and women, participated in the experiment, which involved solving complex chess problems. The thinking aloud method was used to provide 200 pages of verbal protocols. Nine indicators were abstracted and measured: the total number of all moves considered in verbal protocol (M), the number of successive solving propositions or number of fresh starts in decision tree (branches in decision tree – N), the number of different options (A), the number of successive changes in solving propositions (nn), reinvestigations of the move considered the most (Pmax), the longest immediate reinvestigations of the move (Pser), longest variation (Dmax), the value of the move chosen (V), and thinking time (Time). These indicators can be interpreted in terms of problem-solving cognitive strategies. This paper demonstrates the methodology

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18290/pepsi-2024-0001
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment

Adam Biela, Jan Przewoźnik
Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment

Adam Biela, Jan Przewoźnik
article en

Abstract

The authors present chess players’ problem-solving in a three-move experiment. 16 advanced chess players, both men and women, participated in the experiment, which involved solving complex chess problems. The thinking aloud method was used to provide 200 pages of verbal protocols. Nine indicators were abstracted and measured: the total number of all moves considered in verbal protocol (M), the number of successive solving propositions or number of fresh starts in decision tree (branches in decision tree – N), the number of different options (A), the number of successive changes in solving propositions (nn), reinvestigations of the move considered the most (Pmax), the longest immediate reinvestigations of the move (Pser), longest variation (Dmax), the value of the move chosen (V), and thinking time (Time). These indicators can be interpreted in terms of problem-solving cognitive strategies. This paper demonstrates the methodology

Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social IntegrationVol. 30(1)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), Zachodniopomorska Szkoła Biznesu w Szczecinie (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thinking Aloud Indicators in Chess Players’ Complex Problem-Solving in a Three-Move Experiment — Adam Biela, Jan Przewoźnik · Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS