Modelling and optimization of a hybrid photovoltaic-parabolic trough concentrated solar power plant: Technical, economic, and environmental

• Response surface methodology was employed to optimize a hybrid PV-CSP plant. • SAM and PVsyst were used for simulating the CSP and PV systems, respectively. • The optimization procedure was carried out through the Design-Expert software. • The results indicated that the optimal configuration comprises 38.6 % CSP and 61.4 % PV. This research presents detailed guidelines for modeling and optimizing an integrated photovoltaic-concentrated solar power (PV-CSP) plant using response surface methodology (RSM), tailored to the climate of Sharjah, UAE. Five factors are considered in the optimization, which are the percentage share of PV/CSP (A), PV tilt angle (B), PV spacing (C), CSP solar multiple (D), and thermal storage size (E), with corresponding ranges of 10–90% (equivalent to 10 to 90 MW), 20–40°, 1–7 m, 2.5–7.5, and 5–20 h, respectively. The research utilizes three software tools: System Advisor Model (SAM) for CSP, PV syst for PV, and Design-Expert for RSM. Based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA), seven factors (A, C, E, D², AC, AE, and DE) are significant for energy output, while eight (A, C, D, E, AC, AD, AE, and DE) are significant for LCOE. Through multi-objective optimization aimed at maximizing energy production while minimizing LCOE and land area, the results indicate that the optimal configuration comprises 38.6% CSP and 61.4% PV. This configuration achieves an energy output of 3.64 × 10 8 kWh/year, a LCOE of $0.033/kWh, and a land area of 743.46 acres. These results were achieved with B, C, D, and E of 27.18°, 5.45 m, 4.41, and 15.49 h, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Nexus
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100436
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling and optimization of a hybrid photovoltaic-parabolic trough concentrated solar power plant: Technical, economic, and environmental

Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, A.G. Olabi, Salah Haridy, Ayman Mdallal et al.
8 citations
Energy Nexus
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
2.91
article

Modelling and optimization of a hybrid photovoltaic-parabolic trough concentrated solar power plant: Technical, economic, and environmental

Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, A.G. Olabi, Salah Haridy, Ayman Mdallal, Abdul Hai Alami, Montaser Mahmoud
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• Response surface methodology was employed to optimize a hybrid PV-CSP plant. • SAM and PVsyst were used for simulating the CSP and PV systems, respectively. • The optimization procedure was carried out through the Design-Expert software. • The results indicated that the optimal configuration comprises 38.6 % CSP and 61.4 % PV. This research presents detailed guidelines for modeling and optimizing an integrated photovoltaic-concentrated solar power (PV-CSP) plant using response surface methodology (RSM), tailored to the climate of Sharjah, UAE. Five factors are considered in the optimization, which are the percentage share of PV/CSP (A), PV tilt angle (B), PV spacing (C), CSP solar multiple (D), and thermal storage size (E), with corresponding ranges of 10–90% (equivalent to 10 to 90 MW), 20–40°, 1–7 m, 2.5–7.5, and 5–20 h, respectively. The research utilizes three software tools: System Advisor Model (SAM) for CSP, PV syst for PV, and Design-Expert for RSM. Based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA), seven factors (A, C, E, D², AC, AE, and DE) are significant for energy output, while eight (A, C, D, E, AC, AD, AE, and DE) are significant for LCOE. Through multi-objective optimization aimed at maximizing energy production while minimizing LCOE and land area, the results indicate that the optimal configuration comprises 38.6% CSP and 61.4% PV. This configuration achieves an energy output of 3.64 × 10 8 kWh/year, a LCOE of $0.033/kWh, and a land area of 743.46 acres. These results were achieved with B, C, D, and E of 27.18°, 5.45 m, 4.41, and 15.49 h, respectively.

Energy NexusVol. 18
Aston University (GB), University of Sharjah (AE), Minia University (EG), McMaster University (CA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
2.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.