Future poleward distribution shifts of community and functional groups in the Barents Sea modelled under different climate and fisheries scenarios

Arctic ecosystems are among the most impacted by climate change globally. To evaluate future spatial distributions of functional groups (FGs) in the Barents Sea, a spatial mass-balance model (Ecospace) was used to simulate future distributions under a combination of 3 climate scenarios (SSP1-2.6 [cool], SSP2-4.5 [intermediate], and SSP5-8.5 [hot]), and 3 fishing effort (E) levels: intermediate, low, and high. The model was driven by monthly 2D surface and bottom temperature, ice concentration, primary production fields, and E time series from 2020 to 2099. Spatial biomass distributions of the community and most FGs shifted mainly northeast with increasing temperature. In the cool and intermediate scenarios, the temperature decreased or stabilised between the 2050s and 2090s, and the centre of distribution of most FGs returned close to the 2020s positions. In the hot scenario, the community shift rate accelerated from 13 (2020s to 2050s) to 23 km per decade (2050s to 2090s). In this scenario, the spread pattern of the distributions depended on the biogeographic category; many Arctic-boreal and boreal FGs showed a greater increase in spread than Arctic FGs from the 2050s to 2090s. Fishing effort levels affected the spreads of spatial distributions but not the distance and directions of shifts. The Northeast Arctic cod (main target species) showed greater spread at lower fishing effort, possibly a density-dependent range increase. Most FGs showed less clear responses to fishing efforts. We conclude that future distribution shifts were largest for boreal groups in hot scenarios, while in intermediate and cool scenarios, groups returned to present distribution patterns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14868
Primary Topic
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future poleward distribution shifts of community and functional groups in the Barents Sea modelled under different climate and fisheries scenarios

Robinson Hordoir, Torstein Pedersen, Filippa Fransner, Morten D. Skogen et al.
1 links
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
article

Future poleward distribution shifts of community and functional groups in the Barents Sea modelled under different climate and fisheries scenarios

Robinson Hordoir, Torstein Pedersen, Filippa Fransner, Morten D. Skogen, Raul Primicerio, M. Do Nascimento
article en

Abstract

Arctic ecosystems are among the most impacted by climate change globally. To evaluate future spatial distributions of functional groups (FGs) in the Barents Sea, a spatial mass-balance model (Ecospace) was used to simulate future distributions under a combination of 3 climate scenarios (SSP1-2.6 [cool], SSP2-4.5 [intermediate], and SSP5-8.5 [hot]), and 3 fishing effort (E) levels: intermediate, low, and high. The model was driven by monthly 2D surface and bottom temperature, ice concentration, primary production fields, and E time series from 2020 to 2099. Spatial biomass distributions of the community and most FGs shifted mainly northeast with increasing temperature. In the cool and intermediate scenarios, the temperature decreased or stabilised between the 2050s and 2090s, and the centre of distribution of most FGs returned close to the 2020s positions. In the hot scenario, the community shift rate accelerated from 13 (2020s to 2050s) to 23 km per decade (2050s to 2090s). In this scenario, the spread pattern of the distributions depended on the biogeographic category; many Arctic-boreal and boreal FGs showed a greater increase in spread than Arctic FGs from the 2050s to 2090s. Fishing effort levels affected the spreads of spatial distributions but not the distance and directions of shifts. The Northeast Arctic cod (main target species) showed greater spread at lower fishing effort, possibly a density-dependent range increase. Most FGs showed less clear responses to fishing efforts. We conclude that future distribution shifts were largest for boreal groups in hot scenarios, while in intermediate and cool scenarios, groups returned to present distribution patterns.

Marine Ecology Progress SeriesVol. 763
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Food Industry and Aquatic Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.