Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment and Fistulotomy Plus Seton for High-Lying Perianal Fistula

Introduction: This study aims to compare video-assisted anal fistula treatment with fistulotomy plus seton in the management of high perianal fistula in terms of postoperative outcomes. There is limited research on the treatments of high-lying perianal fistulae. This study will help us improve pain severity, return the patients to regular work, improve healing time, and reduce the recurrence rate, leading to better patient management. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Study Period: From July 20, 2024, to January 19, 2025. Methodology: There were 60 patients of high-lying perianal fistulae, ranging in age from 18 to 60 years. Patients having a history of prior perianal surgery, a medical record-based history of inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or a lump on a digital rectal examination that suggested malignancy were excluded. All the patients were assigned to two groups using an online randomizer, i.e., Group A were undergone video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and Group B were undergone fistulotomy plus seton. Postoperative pain was determined 6 hours after the surgery using the visual analogue score. Patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic at three months to determine healing status, anal incontinence and recurrent rate. Findings: Group A (VAAFT) experienced mean post-operative pain of 5.41 ± 1.89, whereas Group B (fistulotomy plus seton) experienced mean post-operative pain of 3.24 ± 1.29 (p-value = 0.0001). In Group A (VAAFT), the mean healing time was 38.40 ± 5.25 days, whereas in Group B (fistulotomy plus seton), it was 25.93 ± 4.30 days (p-value = 0.0001). 33.33% and 0.0% of patients in group A (fistulotomy plus seton) experienced post-operative pain and anal incontinence, respectively, whereas 13.33% and 0.0% of patients in group B (fistulotomy plus seton) did the same. Conclusion: VAAFT is a novel sphincter-saving procedure used to treat high perianal fistulas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70749/ijbr.v3i4.1016
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment and Fistulotomy Plus Seton for High-Lying Perianal Fistula

Muhammad Umar, T. Akram, T. Rizvi, Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh
Indus journal of bioscience research.
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment and Fistulotomy Plus Seton for High-Lying Perianal Fistula

Muhammad Umar, T. Akram, T. Rizvi, Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ayyaz Sheikh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to compare video-assisted anal fistula treatment with fistulotomy plus seton in the management of high perianal fistula in terms of postoperative outcomes. There is limited research on the treatments of high-lying perianal fistulae. This study will help us improve pain severity, return the patients to regular work, improve healing time, and reduce the recurrence rate, leading to better patient management. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Study Period: From July 20, 2024, to January 19, 2025. Methodology: There were 60 patients of high-lying perianal fistulae, ranging in age from 18 to 60 years. Patients having a history of prior perianal surgery, a medical record-based history of inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or a lump on a digital rectal examination that suggested malignancy were excluded. All the patients were assigned to two groups using an online randomizer, i.e., Group A were undergone video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and Group B were undergone fistulotomy plus seton. Postoperative pain was determined 6 hours after the surgery using the visual analogue score. Patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic at three months to determine healing status, anal incontinence and recurrent rate. Findings: Group A (VAAFT) experienced mean post-operative pain of 5.41 ± 1.89, whereas Group B (fistulotomy plus seton) experienced mean post-operative pain of 3.24 ± 1.29 (p-value = 0.0001). In Group A (VAAFT), the mean healing time was 38.40 ± 5.25 days, whereas in Group B (fistulotomy plus seton), it was 25.93 ± 4.30 days (p-value = 0.0001). 33.33% and 0.0% of patients in group A (fistulotomy plus seton) experienced post-operative pain and anal incontinence, respectively, whereas 13.33% and 0.0% of patients in group B (fistulotomy plus seton) did the same. Conclusion: VAAFT is a novel sphincter-saving procedure used to treat high perianal fistulas.

Indus journal of bioscience research.Vol. 3(4)
King Edward Medical University (PK), Punjab Medical College (PK), Lahore General Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.