Growth Behavior and Productivity of Intercrops under Gmelina arborea Based Agroforestry Systems

Agroforestry and intercropping systems offer sustainable alternatives to monoculture, enhancing yield stability and ecosystem services. This study investigated the growth behavior and productivity of three intercrops – Cajanus cajan (Arhar), Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea), and Brassica juncea (Mustard) – within a Gmelina arborea-based agroforestry system compared to their sole cropping counterparts. The field experiment was conducted over two consecutive years (2019-20 and 2020-21) at the Forestry Research Farm, JNKVV, Jabalpur, using a Complete Randomized Block Design with seven treatments (three intercropping combinations, sole Gmelina, and three sole crops) replicated three times. Data were collected on plant population, height, branches per plant, pods/siliques per plant, grains per pod/silique, and grain, straw, and biological yields. Results indicated that sole cropping treatments generally maintained higher plant populations per meter row compared to intercropping under Gmelina. However, growth parameters varied significantly; Gmelina with Arhar (T1) consistently recorded the highest crop height, branches per plant, and total pods per plant across both years and in pooled data, significantly outperforming most other treatments in pod production. Gmelina with Mustard (T3) exhibited high potential, particularly in grain and biological yield, especially in the first year. While sole Arhar (T5) also performed well, particularly for yield components, intercropping combinations demonstrated viable productivity. A general decline in intercrop performance was observed in the second year when Gmelina trees were older. The findings suggest that Gmelina-based agroforestry systems can support diverse crop production, with specific combinations like Gmelina-Arhar and Gmelina-Mustard showing promise, although tree presence influences crop density and yield dynamics over time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Current Research International
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2025/v25i51184
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Growth Behavior and Productivity of Intercrops under Gmelina arborea Based Agroforestry Systems

Solomon Das, Kailash Kumar, R. P. Bajpai, Ajay Kumar Shah et al.
Archives of Current Research International
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Growth Behavior and Productivity of Intercrops under Gmelina arborea Based Agroforestry Systems

Solomon Das, Kailash Kumar, R. P. Bajpai, Ajay Kumar Shah, Vishnu K. Solanki, Yashpal Singh, Rajnendra Prasad Dongre, Pavan Chouksey
article en

Abstract

Agroforestry and intercropping systems offer sustainable alternatives to monoculture, enhancing yield stability and ecosystem services. This study investigated the growth behavior and productivity of three intercrops – Cajanus cajan (Arhar), Vigna unguiculata (Cowpea), and Brassica juncea (Mustard) – within a Gmelina arborea-based agroforestry system compared to their sole cropping counterparts. The field experiment was conducted over two consecutive years (2019-20 and 2020-21) at the Forestry Research Farm, JNKVV, Jabalpur, using a Complete Randomized Block Design with seven treatments (three intercropping combinations, sole Gmelina, and three sole crops) replicated three times. Data were collected on plant population, height, branches per plant, pods/siliques per plant, grains per pod/silique, and grain, straw, and biological yields. Results indicated that sole cropping treatments generally maintained higher plant populations per meter row compared to intercropping under Gmelina. However, growth parameters varied significantly; Gmelina with Arhar (T1) consistently recorded the highest crop height, branches per plant, and total pods per plant across both years and in pooled data, significantly outperforming most other treatments in pod production. Gmelina with Mustard (T3) exhibited high potential, particularly in grain and biological yield, especially in the first year. While sole Arhar (T5) also performed well, particularly for yield components, intercropping combinations demonstrated viable productivity. A general decline in intercrop performance was observed in the second year when Gmelina trees were older. The findings suggest that Gmelina-based agroforestry systems can support diverse crop production, with specific combinations like Gmelina-Arhar and Gmelina-Mustard showing promise, although tree presence influences crop density and yield dynamics over time.

Archives of Current Research InternationalVol. 25(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.