The Effects of User Comments on Corporate Social Advocacy Campaigns: The Mediating Role of Perceived Public Opinion and Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) Motives

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of user-generated comments about a corporate social advocacy (CSA) campaign on public evaluations, focusing on attitudes toward the campaign, the company, and the intention to engage in supportive behaviors. We conducted a 2 (type of CSA campaign: traditional vs. participatory) × 2 (valence of user comments: positive vs. negative) between-subjects online experiment. Positive comments enhance perceived public opinion distribution and value-driven motives, leading to more favorable attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Conversely, negative comments increase skepticism and perceived self-serving motives, decreasing favorable attitudes and supportive behavior intentions. The CSA communication strategy highlighting public participation was ineffective in enhancing attitudes toward the CSA campaign. This study extends the understanding of CSA communication and offers practical insights for effectively leveraging social media to advocate sociopolitical causes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Communication
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/kjc.00009
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of User Comments on Corporate Social Advocacy Campaigns: The Mediating Role of Perceived Public Opinion and Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) Motives

Youngji Seo, Dongjae Lim
Korean Journal of Communication
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The Effects of User Comments on Corporate Social Advocacy Campaigns: The Mediating Role of Perceived Public Opinion and Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) Motives

Youngji Seo, Dongjae Lim
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of user-generated comments about a corporate social advocacy (CSA) campaign on public evaluations, focusing on attitudes toward the campaign, the company, and the intention to engage in supportive behaviors. We conducted a 2 (type of CSA campaign: traditional vs. participatory) × 2 (valence of user comments: positive vs. negative) between-subjects online experiment. Positive comments enhance perceived public opinion distribution and value-driven motives, leading to more favorable attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Conversely, negative comments increase skepticism and perceived self-serving motives, decreasing favorable attitudes and supportive behavior intentions. The CSA communication strategy highlighting public participation was ineffective in enhancing attitudes toward the CSA campaign. This study extends the understanding of CSA communication and offers practical insights for effectively leveraging social media to advocate sociopolitical causes.

Korean Journal of CommunicationVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effects of User Comments on Corporate Social Advocacy Campaigns: The Mediating Role of Perceived Public Opinion and Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) Motives — Youngji Seo, Dongjae Lim · Korean Journal of Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS