Aquifer vulnerability assessment in data-scarce areas: a spatially explicit assessment

Groundwater pollution presents a serious concern in arid and semiarid regions, where water resources are already limited. In such contexts, reliable and efficient methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability are critical. Without adequate knowledge of the vulnerability, groundwater is at greater risk of severe contamination. This not only threatens the availability of clean water but also demands significant time and financial resources for remediation and restoration. Modelling groundwater vulnerability is even more demanding and complex in data-scarce regions. Consequently, this study investigates and predicts spatial variations in groundwater quality and vulnerability within a data-scarce area by applying efficient machine learning methods that compensate for the limited availability of quality groundwater data. Supportive machine learning approaches such as bagged adaptive boosting (BAB), averaged neural network (avNNet), heteroscedastic discriminant analysis (HAD), rotation forest (RotationF), and an ensemble method were applied to assess groundwater vulnerability using k-fold cross-validation. The results demonstrate that the BAB model achieved the best performance, with both accuracy and precision exceeding 85%. Furthermore, the stacking ensemble approach, specifically the BAB model combination, increased precision by 4% and reduced false alarms by 6%. The most influential variables affecting groundwater quality include groundwater depth, precipitation, proximity to waterways and roads, topographic humidity, and the percentage of fine-grain material. The results also show that variability in the data significantly impacts the modelling performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2487816
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aquifer vulnerability assessment in data-scarce areas: a spatially explicit assessment

Sayed M. Bateni, Hao-Ting Pai, Meghdad Biyari, Ely Salwana et al.
2 citations
Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
1.60
article

Aquifer vulnerability assessment in data-scarce areas: a spatially explicit assessment

Sayed M. Bateni, Hao-Ting Pai, Meghdad Biyari, Ely Salwana, Changhyun Jun, Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini, Bahram Choubin, Dongkyun Kim, Amir Mosavi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Groundwater pollution presents a serious concern in arid and semiarid regions, where water resources are already limited. In such contexts, reliable and efficient methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability are critical. Without adequate knowledge of the vulnerability, groundwater is at greater risk of severe contamination. This not only threatens the availability of clean water but also demands significant time and financial resources for remediation and restoration. Modelling groundwater vulnerability is even more demanding and complex in data-scarce regions. Consequently, this study investigates and predicts spatial variations in groundwater quality and vulnerability within a data-scarce area by applying efficient machine learning methods that compensate for the limited availability of quality groundwater data. Supportive machine learning approaches such as bagged adaptive boosting (BAB), averaged neural network (avNNet), heteroscedastic discriminant analysis (HAD), rotation forest (RotationF), and an ensemble method were applied to assess groundwater vulnerability using k-fold cross-validation. The results demonstrate that the BAB model achieved the best performance, with both accuracy and precision exceeding 85%. Furthermore, the stacking ensemble approach, specifically the BAB model combination, increased precision by 4% and reduced false alarms by 6%. The most influential variables affecting groundwater quality include groundwater depth, precipitation, proximity to waterways and roads, topographic humidity, and the percentage of fine-grain material. The results also show that variability in the data significantly impacts the modelling performance.

Geomatics Natural Hazards and RiskVol. 16(1)
Obuda University (HU), University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), National Pingtung University (TW), Ludovika University of Public Service (HU), University of South Africa (ZA), Korea University (KR), University of Tehran (IR), Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research (IR), Agricultural Research & Education Organization (IR), National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW), National University of Malaysia (MY), Hongik University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Environment, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, India, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, National Science and Technology Council, Korea Environmental Industry and Technology Institute
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.