Temporality and the Brain: The Long and Winding Emergence of Time in Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract Understanding how our sensory apparatus generates percepts and coherent experiences of the world has been the outstanding quest of centuries. Throughout history, philosophers, biologists, psychologists, and – in the past few decades—cognitive neuroscientists have all sought answers to how our brain generates thinking and feeling, behavior, and consciousness. In this contribution, we discuss a bias that has, by and large, characterized this quest, namely a spatial approach towards understanding the neural correlates and mechanisms of cognition. In what follows, we critically assess the spatial emphasis in the study of the brain and cognitive functions. In our historical account of this emphasis, we point to tacit assumptions and limitations of this scientific approach. We also highlight moments in which the potential for incorporating time and temporal organizing principles was either overlooked or missed due to the ruling perspective. We then discuss the value and potential of integrating the temporal domain into our understanding of the brain and cognitive functions by providing examples that have finally emerged in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Arenas
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-025-00497-8
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporality and the Brain: The Long and Winding Emergence of Time in Cognitive Neuroscience

Flor Kusnir, Ayelet N. Landau
Human Arenas
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
article

Temporality and the Brain: The Long and Winding Emergence of Time in Cognitive Neuroscience

Flor Kusnir, Ayelet N. Landau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding how our sensory apparatus generates percepts and coherent experiences of the world has been the outstanding quest of centuries. Throughout history, philosophers, biologists, psychologists, and – in the past few decades—cognitive neuroscientists have all sought answers to how our brain generates thinking and feeling, behavior, and consciousness. In this contribution, we discuss a bias that has, by and large, characterized this quest, namely a spatial approach towards understanding the neural correlates and mechanisms of cognition. In what follows, we critically assess the spatial emphasis in the study of the brain and cognitive functions. In our historical account of this emphasis, we point to tacit assumptions and limitations of this scientific approach. We also highlight moments in which the potential for incorporating time and temporal organizing principles was either overlooked or missed due to the ruling perspective. We then discuss the value and potential of integrating the temporal domain into our understanding of the brain and cognitive functions by providing examples that have finally emerged in the field.

Human Arenas
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin (DE), University College London (GB)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.