Raking Method as a Tool for Improving Representativeness in Non-Probability Studies

This is a methodological review focused on raking, or iterative proportional fitting, as a tool for improving representativeness in studies with non-probability sampling. The paper synthesizes the theoretical foundations, practical considerations, and applications of raking in biomedical research. The method operates by iteratively adjusting sample weights so that the marginal distributions of selected variables match the known distributions of the target population. Its implementation requires reliable auxiliary information about the population of interest and careful selection of adjustment variables. The review addresses critical aspects such as weight quality evaluation, management of extreme values, and computational considerations in raking implementation. The method's advantages are discussed, including its capacity to simultaneously adjust multiple variables and its applicability when only marginal information about the population is available. Its limitations are also examined, such as the potential generation of extreme weights and dependence on precise population data. Finally, practical examples are presented in various contexts, from hospital studies to research in university populations, demonstrating the method's versatility. The application of raking has proven particularly valuable in epidemiological and health services studies, where non-probability samples are common. This review provides a comprehensive methodological guide for researchers seeking to implement raking, emphasizing the importance of rigorous application and transparent documentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.22
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Raking Method as a Tool for Improving Representativeness in Non-Probability Studies

Ana Fuentes Coronel, Fiorella Elvira Zuzunaga-Montoya, Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce, Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval et al.
1 links
International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Raking Method as a Tool for Improving Representativeness in Non-Probability Studies

Ana Fuentes Coronel, Fiorella Elvira Zuzunaga-Montoya, Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce, Lupita Ana Maria Valladolid-Sandoval, Nataly Mayely Sanchez-Tamay, Carmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo, Christian Humberto Huaman-Vega, Juan Carlos Bustamante-Rodríguez, Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo
article en

Abstract

This is a methodological review focused on raking, or iterative proportional fitting, as a tool for improving representativeness in studies with non-probability sampling. The paper synthesizes the theoretical foundations, practical considerations, and applications of raking in biomedical research. The method operates by iteratively adjusting sample weights so that the marginal distributions of selected variables match the known distributions of the target population. Its implementation requires reliable auxiliary information about the population of interest and careful selection of adjustment variables. The review addresses critical aspects such as weight quality evaluation, management of extreme values, and computational considerations in raking implementation. The method's advantages are discussed, including its capacity to simultaneously adjust multiple variables and its applicability when only marginal information about the population is available. Its limitations are also examined, such as the potential generation of extreme weights and dependence on precise population data. Finally, practical examples are presented in various contexts, from hospital studies to research in university populations, demonstrating the method's versatility. The application of raking has proven particularly valuable in epidemiological and health services studies, where non-probability samples are common. This review provides a comprehensive methodological guide for researchers seeking to implement raking, emphasizing the importance of rigorous application and transparent documentation.

International Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchVol. 14
National University Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza (PE), Universidad Continental (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.