The Impact of Prioritisation and Eligibility Criteria on Social Services Intake Processes: An International Systematic Review (1993–2024)

This systematic review examines the impact of prioritisation and eligibility criteria on social services’ intake processes. By analysing 22 studies from nine countries over three decades, this review identifies key patterns in how these criteria influence access to social assistance. Using thematic analysis, this study highlights that automation has improved efficiency by reducing administrative costs and wait times, but has also created access barriers for older adults, migrants, and individuals with limited digital skills. Additionally, gender and intersectionality play a crucial role, with men facing stricter eligibility requirements and migrant women experiencing higher approval rates. The findings also reveal that professionals’ subjective perceptions influence decisions, introducing biases that affect equitable resource distribution. While prioritisation systems streamline service delivery, they also lead to inconsistencies across different social service centres, potentially reinforcing social inequalities. This review emphasises the need to balance efficiency with fairness, ensuring that eligibility criteria do not become exclusionary mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050262
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Prioritisation and Eligibility Criteria on Social Services Intake Processes: An International Systematic Review (1993–2024)

Yolanda De la Fuente Robles, Virginia Fuentes Gutiérrez, Marta García‐Domingo, David Ruíz-Ortega
Social Sciences
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

The Impact of Prioritisation and Eligibility Criteria on Social Services Intake Processes: An International Systematic Review (1993–2024)

Yolanda De la Fuente Robles, Virginia Fuentes Gutiérrez, Marta García‐Domingo, David Ruíz-Ortega
article en

Abstract

This systematic review examines the impact of prioritisation and eligibility criteria on social services’ intake processes. By analysing 22 studies from nine countries over three decades, this review identifies key patterns in how these criteria influence access to social assistance. Using thematic analysis, this study highlights that automation has improved efficiency by reducing administrative costs and wait times, but has also created access barriers for older adults, migrants, and individuals with limited digital skills. Additionally, gender and intersectionality play a crucial role, with men facing stricter eligibility requirements and migrant women experiencing higher approval rates. The findings also reveal that professionals’ subjective perceptions influence decisions, introducing biases that affect equitable resource distribution. While prioritisation systems streamline service delivery, they also lead to inconsistencies across different social service centres, potentially reinforcing social inequalities. This review emphasises the need to balance efficiency with fairness, ensuring that eligibility criteria do not become exclusionary mechanisms.

Social SciencesVol. 14(5)
Universidad de Jaén (ES)
Junta de Andalucía
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.