Field and Numerical Evaluations of Static and Dynamic Live Load Response in Skewed Steel I-Girder Bridges with Stub and Integral Abutments

The behavior of skewed steel I-girder bridges under live load is complex and challenging to interpret due to sparse existing field data; predictions used in the design process can include oversimplifications regarding superstructure load distribution and girder lateral response. To further understand the static and dynamic live load response of skewed steel I-girder bridges with different abutment conditions, two continuous-span steel I-girder bridges, one of skew 41° with stub abutments and the other of skew 45° with integral abutments, were evaluated in the field under isolated (single truck) live load as full and temporary half (during staged construction) bridges. Tests were conducted at 3, 32, and 56 km/h (2, 20, and 35 mi/h, respectively) for multiple load paths; data acquisition systems measured field response at 20 Hz. Girders and cross-frames were instrumented with strain gauges, girder end rotations were measured with tiltmeters, and bridge end movements were monitored with displacement transducers. Field instrumentation provides insight into superstructure behavior and data for validation and refinement of three-dimensional numerical simulation approaches (e.g., representation of abutment and bearing conditions, proper inclusion of structural components, and modeling of connections). The simulation approaches were then adopted for assessing bridge live load behavior beyond the range of field measurements, which can also be used in other research with limited access to field information. The live load distribution factor for girder strong-axis bending in standard line girder analysis was observed to be conservative, especially for interior girders when considering loading from the isolated test truck. Girder bottom flange lateral bending stress along the bridge span (in-span) was more significant for interior than exterior girders under the live load tests, whereas the lateral bending stress near bridge supports was mostly uniform for all girders (and of smaller magnitude than the in-span stress). Truck live load generally induced the most critical response on adjacent girders and cross-frames, except when loading close to an exterior girder—considerable bottom flange lateral bending response was observed on multiple adjacent interior girders for the exterior loading, with peak stresses away from the directly loaded bridge obtuse corners. Dynamic live load effects were evaluated by calculating dynamic load allowance (DLA) based on field measurements; the DLA used in standard practice for strength limit states was generally acceptable but slightly unconservative for an integral abutment bridge exterior girder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-6767
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field and Numerical Evaluations of Static and Dynamic Live Load Response in Skewed Steel I-Girder Bridges with Stub and Integral Abutments

Ricardo Dorado, Larry A. Fahnestock, James M. LaFave, Siang Zhou
1 citations
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.95
article

Field and Numerical Evaluations of Static and Dynamic Live Load Response in Skewed Steel I-Girder Bridges with Stub and Integral Abutments

Ricardo Dorado, Larry A. Fahnestock, James M. LaFave, Siang Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The behavior of skewed steel I-girder bridges under live load is complex and challenging to interpret due to sparse existing field data; predictions used in the design process can include oversimplifications regarding superstructure load distribution and girder lateral response. To further understand the static and dynamic live load response of skewed steel I-girder bridges with different abutment conditions, two continuous-span steel I-girder bridges, one of skew 41° with stub abutments and the other of skew 45° with integral abutments, were evaluated in the field under isolated (single truck) live load as full and temporary half (during staged construction) bridges. Tests were conducted at 3, 32, and 56 km/h (2, 20, and 35 mi/h, respectively) for multiple load paths; data acquisition systems measured field response at 20 Hz. Girders and cross-frames were instrumented with strain gauges, girder end rotations were measured with tiltmeters, and bridge end movements were monitored with displacement transducers. Field instrumentation provides insight into superstructure behavior and data for validation and refinement of three-dimensional numerical simulation approaches (e.g., representation of abutment and bearing conditions, proper inclusion of structural components, and modeling of connections). The simulation approaches were then adopted for assessing bridge live load behavior beyond the range of field measurements, which can also be used in other research with limited access to field information. The live load distribution factor for girder strong-axis bending in standard line girder analysis was observed to be conservative, especially for interior girders when considering loading from the isolated test truck. Girder bottom flange lateral bending stress along the bridge span (in-span) was more significant for interior than exterior girders under the live load tests, whereas the lateral bending stress near bridge supports was mostly uniform for all girders (and of smaller magnitude than the in-span stress). Truck live load generally induced the most critical response on adjacent girders and cross-frames, except when loading close to an exterior girder—considerable bottom flange lateral bending response was observed on multiple adjacent interior girders for the exterior loading, with peak stresses away from the directly loaded bridge obtuse corners. Dynamic live load effects were evaluated by calculating dynamic load allowance (DLA) based on field measurements; the DLA used in standard practice for strength limit states was generally acceptable but slightly unconservative for an integral abutment bridge exterior girder.

Journal of Bridge EngineeringVol. 30(7)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.