Bias-Corrected Fixed Item Parameter Calibration, with an Application to PISA Data

Fixed item parameter calibration (FIPC) is commonly used to compare groups or countries using an item response theory model with a common set of fixed item parameters. However, FIPC has been shown to produce biased estimates of group means and standard deviations in the presence of random differential item functioning (DIF). To address this, a bias-corrected variant of FIPC, called BCFIPC, is introduced in this article. BCFIPC eliminated the bias of FIPC with only minor efficiency losses in certain simulation conditions, but substantial precision gains in many others, particularly for estimating group standard deviations. Finally, a comparison of both methods using the PISA 2009 dataset revealed relatively large differences in country means and standard deviations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stats
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/stats8020029
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias-Corrected Fixed Item Parameter Calibration, with an Application to PISA Data

Alexander Robitzsch
Stats
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Bias-Corrected Fixed Item Parameter Calibration, with an Application to PISA Data

Alexander Robitzsch
article en

Abstract

Fixed item parameter calibration (FIPC) is commonly used to compare groups or countries using an item response theory model with a common set of fixed item parameters. However, FIPC has been shown to produce biased estimates of group means and standard deviations in the presence of random differential item functioning (DIF). To address this, a bias-corrected variant of FIPC, called BCFIPC, is introduced in this article. BCFIPC eliminated the bias of FIPC with only minor efficiency losses in certain simulation conditions, but substantial precision gains in many others, particularly for estimating group standard deviations. Finally, a comparison of both methods using the PISA 2009 dataset revealed relatively large differences in country means and standard deviations.

StatsVol. 8(2)
Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bias-Corrected Fixed Item Parameter Calibration, with an Application to PISA Data — Alexander Robitzsch · Stats (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS