Centering environmental justice in United States (U.S.) National Climate Assessments (NCAs): a historical and contemporary analysis

Abstract Since 1990, the U.S. Global Change Research Program has published five cross-sectoral National Climate Assessment (NCA) reports. Federal, state, and local governments, policymakers, and the public employ NCAs to analyze climate risks, impacts, and adaptation and mitigation options. This article surveys the NCA landscape and makes the case for centering environmental justice (EJ) to inform actionable, relevant, and accessible climate change science and responses. Case studies of NCA1 through NCA5, released during the Clinton, Obama, Trump, and Biden presidential administrations, examine the roles of EJ, the conceptual integration of transdisciplinary research efforts, and data equity considerations. The paper concludes with policy recommendations to “center” EJ into climate assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climatic Change
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03924-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centering environmental justice in United States (U.S.) National Climate Assessments (NCAs): a historical and contemporary analysis

Beth Rose Middleton Manning, Megan Mills‐Novoa, Julie Maldonado, Michael Méndez et al.
2 citations
Climatic Change
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
8.40
article

Centering environmental justice in United States (U.S.) National Climate Assessments (NCAs): a historical and contemporary analysis

Beth Rose Middleton Manning, Megan Mills‐Novoa, Julie Maldonado, Michael Méndez, Cynthia Golembeski, Tisha Holmes, Linda Estelí Méndez‐Barrientos, Leo Goldsmith, J. Mijin Cha, Louise Bedsworth, Sameer H. Shah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Since 1990, the U.S. Global Change Research Program has published five cross-sectoral National Climate Assessment (NCA) reports. Federal, state, and local governments, policymakers, and the public employ NCAs to analyze climate risks, impacts, and adaptation and mitigation options. This article surveys the NCA landscape and makes the case for centering environmental justice (EJ) to inform actionable, relevant, and accessible climate change science and responses. Case studies of NCA1 through NCA5, released during the Clinton, Obama, Trump, and Biden presidential administrations, examine the roles of EJ, the conceptual integration of transdisciplinary research efforts, and data equity considerations. The paper concludes with policy recommendations to “center” EJ into climate assessments.

Climatic ChangeVol. 178(5)
The New School (US), Florida State University (US), University of Denver (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), University of Washington (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Yale University (US), Institute of Livelihood Research and Training (IN), University of California, Davis (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Science Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, National Center for Atmospheric Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.