Reconsidering the Typology of Parenting Styles and Its Association With Preschoolers' Development in Chinese Families

Using latent profile analysis, the study examined distinct joint parenting styles among Chinese families with preschoolers (N = 300; 51.7% girls; M<sub>age</sub> = 55.97 months). This study incorporated maternal and paternal reports on multiple parenting dimensions that covered both Western- and Chinese-emphasized practices. Using data collected between 2017 and 2019 from Shanghai, four joint parenting styles emerged: authoritative (39.3%), moderately supportive (38.0%), strict-affectionate (14.3%), and authoritarian (8.4%). Authoritarian and moderately supportive parenting styles were linked to poorer child outcomes 1.5 years later compared to authoritative parenting. However, there were no significant differences in most child outcomes between authoritative and strict-affectionate parenting. These findings necessitate a reevaluation of the parenting typology and its effects on child development in the Chinese context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14236
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering the Typology of Parenting Styles and Its Association With Preschoolers' Development in Chinese Families

Lixin Ren, Lin Li, Jiayi Li, Xuan Li et al.
3 citations
Child Development
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
6.92
article

Reconsidering the Typology of Parenting Styles and Its Association With Preschoolers' Development in Chinese Families

Lixin Ren, Lin Li, Jiayi Li, Xuan Li, Yeqing Li, Jieqiong Fan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Using latent profile analysis, the study examined distinct joint parenting styles among Chinese families with preschoolers (N = 300; 51.7% girls; M<sub>age</sub> = 55.97 months). This study incorporated maternal and paternal reports on multiple parenting dimensions that covered both Western- and Chinese-emphasized practices. Using data collected between 2017 and 2019 from Shanghai, four joint parenting styles emerged: authoritative (39.3%), moderately supportive (38.0%), strict-affectionate (14.3%), and authoritarian (8.4%). Authoritarian and moderately supportive parenting styles were linked to poorer child outcomes 1.5 years later compared to authoritative parenting. However, there were no significant differences in most child outcomes between authoritative and strict-affectionate parenting. These findings necessitate a reevaluation of the parenting typology and its effects on child development in the Chinese context.

Child DevelopmentVol. 96(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University College Copenhagen (DK), East China Normal University (CN), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.