The Difference and Improvement of the Private Education Fiscal Policies of China and the United States

As the economy grows, education comes into public sight due to the increasing need for diverse kinds and high quality of education and attracted attention, however, inequality and faultiness are still present. By comparing private education in China and the United States in terms of national policies and local government measures, the shortcomings of private education in China, such as immature local educational funding tools and few educational resource voucher purchases are presented in this research, while some suggestions putting forward to illustrate the question. The paper proposes some solutions to ameliorate the defects, such as the offers to improve China's private education by promoting regional cooperation, standardizing the amount and form of financial subsidies, raising teachers' income, increasing the flexibility of education savings accounts, popularizing education vouchers to enhance the universality, and improve compulsory norms and policy standards, etc. These methods emphasize that while learning from the experience of the United States, the national conditions of China are also required to be taken into account to form and adjust local decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/sej9c589
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Difference and Improvement of the Private Education Fiscal Policies of China and the United States

Yu Liu
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

The Difference and Improvement of the Private Education Fiscal Policies of China and the United States

Yu Liu
article en

Abstract

As the economy grows, education comes into public sight due to the increasing need for diverse kinds and high quality of education and attracted attention, however, inequality and faultiness are still present. By comparing private education in China and the United States in terms of national policies and local government measures, the shortcomings of private education in China, such as immature local educational funding tools and few educational resource voucher purchases are presented in this research, while some suggestions putting forward to illustrate the question. The paper proposes some solutions to ameliorate the defects, such as the offers to improve China's private education by promoting regional cooperation, standardizing the amount and form of financial subsidies, raising teachers' income, increasing the flexibility of education savings accounts, popularizing education vouchers to enhance the universality, and improve compulsory norms and policy standards, etc. These methods emphasize that while learning from the experience of the United States, the national conditions of China are also required to be taken into account to form and adjust local decisions.

Journal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 50
Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.