Modeling and analysis of measurement error for a four-axis optical profilometer

Multi-axis optical profilometers are precision instruments used in optics and aerospace, where geometric errors critically impact measurement accuracy. This paper introduces an approach for error modeling and analysis for a four-axis optical profilometer. Utilizing MBS theory and the HTM method, a measurement error model with forty-five geometric errors is established. Based on the principle of measurement error, a new error sensitivity evaluation index-effective working distance error (<i>WDE</i><sub>e</sub>)-is proposed, taking into account the surface profile of the workpiece. Comparative experiments demonstrate that the measurement results compensated using the proposed method (3.189 µm) are closer to the LUPHOscan reference results (2.985 µm) than those obtained using conventional methods (3.320 µm), thus validating the effectiveness of the approach. This method replaces six traditional volumetric error indexes with a comprehensive index, improving sensitivity analysis and error compensation efficiency and effectiveness, thereby enhancing optical profilometer performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.561882
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and analysis of measurement error for a four-axis optical profilometer

Wei Wang, Daming Huang, Zhipeng Yang, Sicheng Jiao et al.
2 citations
Optics Express
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
1.43
article

Modeling and analysis of measurement error for a four-axis optical profilometer

Wei Wang, Daming Huang, Zhipeng Yang, Sicheng Jiao, Fang Ji, Min Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Multi-axis optical profilometers are precision instruments used in optics and aerospace, where geometric errors critically impact measurement accuracy. This paper introduces an approach for error modeling and analysis for a four-axis optical profilometer. Utilizing MBS theory and the HTM method, a measurement error model with forty-five geometric errors is established. Based on the principle of measurement error, a new error sensitivity evaluation index-effective working distance error (<i>WDE</i><sub>e</sub>)-is proposed, taking into account the surface profile of the workpiece. Comparative experiments demonstrate that the measurement results compensated using the proposed method (3.189 µm) are closer to the LUPHOscan reference results (2.985 µm) than those obtained using conventional methods (3.320 µm), thus validating the effectiveness of the approach. This method replaces six traditional volumetric error indexes with a comprehensive index, improving sensitivity analysis and error compensation efficiency and effectiveness, thereby enhancing optical profilometer performance.

Optics ExpressVol. 33(10)
General Electric (Finland) (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling and analysis of measurement error for a four-axis optical profilometer — Wei Wang, Daming Huang, et al. · Optics Express (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS