GENERAL TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT ON THE PRINCIPLES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF CENTRAL EXECUTIVE BODIES IN THE PERIOD FROM 2010 TO 2013

The article analyzed the general trends in the development of scientific thought on the principles of the functioning of central executive bodies in the period from 2002 to 2013. It was emphasized that this time period is characterized by the following features: 1) it testified to a gradual departure from the command-administrative system of management, which permeated all executive bodies during the Soviet period, and to a transition to democratic principles of functioning; 2) it testified to the further evolution of executive bodies both at the intellectual level (monographs, dissertations, scientific articles) and at the practical level (development and adoption of relevant regulatory legal acts); 3) the development of scientific thought during this period took place under the auspices of administrative reform, but without a significant influence of political goals and interests on research areas. It is proposed to highlight among the studies of the features of the functioning of executive bodies in the period from 2002 to 2013 works that were devoted to: 1) the functioning of the executive branch as one of the branches of state power; 2) one type of central executive bodies, in particular, ministries, local executive bodies or one central executive body (for example, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine,the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine, etc.); 3) one type of activity of executive bodies (for example, rule-making, jurisdictional, public service activities, etc.); 4) the activity of one of the subsystems of executive bodies in a specific sphere of public relations, in which these bodies exercise specific powers (for example, procedural activities of internal affairs bodies in proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, etc.); 5) internal relations in the system of executive bodies (in particular, disciplinary relations, legal status of heads in the system of executive bodies, etc.). It has been established that from a historical point of view, the effectiveness of the activities of ministries has always been negatively affected by the following factors: 1) the absence of a holistic, scientifically based and effective model of the mechanism of relations between the branches of state power; 2) the one-sided perception by certain political forces of the directions of reforming the executive bodies; 3) the uncertainty of the place and role of the President of Ukraine in the mechanism of functioning of the executive bodies; 4) the imperfection of national legislation, which establishes the administrative and legal statusof executive bodies; 5) the low level of political and legal culture of both the population and officials of state bodies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Constitutional State
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18524/2411-2054.2025.57.325389
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GENERAL TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT ON THE PRINCIPLES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF CENTRAL EXECUTIVE BODIES IN THE PERIOD FROM 2010 TO 2013

V. S. Rudov
Constitutional State
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

GENERAL TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT ON THE PRINCIPLES OF THE FUNCTIONING OF CENTRAL EXECUTIVE BODIES IN THE PERIOD FROM 2010 TO 2013

V. S. Rudov
article en

Abstract

The article analyzed the general trends in the development of scientific thought on the principles of the functioning of central executive bodies in the period from 2002 to 2013. It was emphasized that this time period is characterized by the following features: 1) it testified to a gradual departure from the command-administrative system of management, which permeated all executive bodies during the Soviet period, and to a transition to democratic principles of functioning; 2) it testified to the further evolution of executive bodies both at the intellectual level (monographs, dissertations, scientific articles) and at the practical level (development and adoption of relevant regulatory legal acts); 3) the development of scientific thought during this period took place under the auspices of administrative reform, but without a significant influence of political goals and interests on research areas. It is proposed to highlight among the studies of the features of the functioning of executive bodies in the period from 2002 to 2013 works that were devoted to: 1) the functioning of the executive branch as one of the branches of state power; 2) one type of central executive bodies, in particular, ministries, local executive bodies or one central executive body (for example, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine,the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine, etc.); 3) one type of activity of executive bodies (for example, rule-making, jurisdictional, public service activities, etc.); 4) the activity of one of the subsystems of executive bodies in a specific sphere of public relations, in which these bodies exercise specific powers (for example, procedural activities of internal affairs bodies in proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, etc.); 5) internal relations in the system of executive bodies (in particular, disciplinary relations, legal status of heads in the system of executive bodies, etc.). It has been established that from a historical point of view, the effectiveness of the activities of ministries has always been negatively affected by the following factors: 1) the absence of a holistic, scientifically based and effective model of the mechanism of relations between the branches of state power; 2) the one-sided perception by certain political forces of the directions of reforming the executive bodies; 3) the uncertainty of the place and role of the President of Ukraine in the mechanism of functioning of the executive bodies; 4) the imperfection of national legislation, which establishes the administrative and legal statusof executive bodies; 5) the low level of political and legal culture of both the population and officials of state bodies.

Constitutional State(57)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.