Labour Market Regulation and the Economics of Precarious Knowledge Work

This study examines how evolving labour market regulations and economic drivers shape the proliferation of precarious employment in knowledge and communication sectors. Drawing on a critical cultural political economy framework, we map the deregulatory shifts eroding collectively negotiated rights and imposing “compulsory flexibility” that amplifies worker vulnerability. We extend Sum and Jessop’s analysis by integrating institutional economics and power-relations theory to capture the market imperatives underpinning precariatisation. Our refined conceptualisation highlights how economic structures, regulatory frameworks, and information-system dynamics converge to generate insecure work. Through a synthesis of Foucauldian analytics, phenomenological insights, and economic analysis, we illuminate the lived experiences of knowledge workers and the systemic forces driving precarity. We illustrate these dynamics with examples from academic and communicative sectors, demonstrating the universal relevance of precariatisation across knowledge economies. This tighter economic lens reveals actionable pathways for equitable labour regulation, offering policy recommendations to stabilise working conditions and rebalance power in knowledge-driven market

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Journal of Labor and Economics
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62693/nra1w004
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labour Market Regulation and the Economics of Precarious Knowledge Work

Hanne Dauer Keller, Kurt Dauer Keller
Interdisciplinary Journal of Labor and Economics
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Labour Market Regulation and the Economics of Precarious Knowledge Work

Hanne Dauer Keller, Kurt Dauer Keller
article en

Abstract

This study examines how evolving labour market regulations and economic drivers shape the proliferation of precarious employment in knowledge and communication sectors. Drawing on a critical cultural political economy framework, we map the deregulatory shifts eroding collectively negotiated rights and imposing “compulsory flexibility” that amplifies worker vulnerability. We extend Sum and Jessop’s analysis by integrating institutional economics and power-relations theory to capture the market imperatives underpinning precariatisation. Our refined conceptualisation highlights how economic structures, regulatory frameworks, and information-system dynamics converge to generate insecure work. Through a synthesis of Foucauldian analytics, phenomenological insights, and economic analysis, we illuminate the lived experiences of knowledge workers and the systemic forces driving precarity. We illustrate these dynamics with examples from academic and communicative sectors, demonstrating the universal relevance of precariatisation across knowledge economies. This tighter economic lens reveals actionable pathways for equitable labour regulation, offering policy recommendations to stabilise working conditions and rebalance power in knowledge-driven market

Interdisciplinary Journal of Labor and EconomicsVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.