SELF-MANAGED BOARD OF DIRECTORS

In the article author analyses the impact of artificial intelligence on corporate governance within a one-tier structure, highlights the current legal regulation regarding the procedures and conditions for the usage of artificial intelligence, provides suggestions for the legal framework to support the development of the self-managed boards of directors. Despite the low level of scientific legal research on these issues, they will become even more relevant with the develop­ment of technological progress, which will enable the formation of fully self-managed boards of directors. The author formulates original definitions for the terms “robot-director” and “self-managed board of directors” and refines the definition of the term “board of directors”. Regarding the fact that directors already use artificial intelligence as an auxiliary tool there is a conclusion that the first step for legislators should be establishing a mandatory obligation to create a data management and cybersecurity committee in corporations where the creation of audit, nomination, and remuneration committees is already mandatory. The author notes there are three aspects of the artificial governance within a one-tier structure. Firstly, the functions of the board of directors should include management, control, risk management, data management, and cybersecurity. Secondly, the separation of ownership and control of artificial intelligence should be ensured, and the control of artificial intelligence itself should be carried out by a fiduciary independent non-executive director. Thirdly, the cor­poration with self-managed board should compensate the damages to the injured party, the developer and / or licensor of the “robot-director” program (for identified flaws and defects), and / or the fiduciary independent non-executive director (for negligence or interference with the operation of artificial intelligence) should be held accountable under corporate liability. The research methods include historical-legal, textual, and doctrinal analysis. Additionally, a normative-conceptual method is used to develop new approaches to regulating corporate gov­ernance within a one-tier structure in the context of technological changes and the development of artificial intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Constitutional State
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18524/2411-2054.2025.57.325393
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SELF-MANAGED BOARD OF DIRECTORS

O. V. Sert
Constitutional State
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

SELF-MANAGED BOARD OF DIRECTORS

O. V. Sert
article en

Abstract

In the article author analyses the impact of artificial intelligence on corporate governance within a one-tier structure, highlights the current legal regulation regarding the procedures and conditions for the usage of artificial intelligence, provides suggestions for the legal framework to support the development of the self-managed boards of directors. Despite the low level of scientific legal research on these issues, they will become even more relevant with the develop­ment of technological progress, which will enable the formation of fully self-managed boards of directors. The author formulates original definitions for the terms “robot-director” and “self-managed board of directors” and refines the definition of the term “board of directors”. Regarding the fact that directors already use artificial intelligence as an auxiliary tool there is a conclusion that the first step for legislators should be establishing a mandatory obligation to create a data management and cybersecurity committee in corporations where the creation of audit, nomination, and remuneration committees is already mandatory. The author notes there are three aspects of the artificial governance within a one-tier structure. Firstly, the functions of the board of directors should include management, control, risk management, data management, and cybersecurity. Secondly, the separation of ownership and control of artificial intelligence should be ensured, and the control of artificial intelligence itself should be carried out by a fiduciary independent non-executive director. Thirdly, the cor­poration with self-managed board should compensate the damages to the injured party, the developer and / or licensor of the “robot-director” program (for identified flaws and defects), and / or the fiduciary independent non-executive director (for negligence or interference with the operation of artificial intelligence) should be held accountable under corporate liability. The research methods include historical-legal, textual, and doctrinal analysis. Additionally, a normative-conceptual method is used to develop new approaches to regulating corporate gov­ernance within a one-tier structure in the context of technological changes and the development of artificial intelligence.

Constitutional State(57)
Max Planck Society (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.