Human–Technics Intra-Action
Don Ihde introduced the concept of multistability: the “same” thing can be experienced in multiple ways. He argued that human–technics relations are multistable: the “same” person can relate to the “same” technic in different ways. However, Ihde does not explain in detail how he understands experience. I suggest that experience be defined as organism–environment intra-action. This definition has anthropological consequences, which I will explain. In this article, I will argue that technics influence human nature, at least potentially, in two ways. First, our character consists in our habits, and each habit is a skill, or active means. Second, habits incorporate both the traits of persons and of their environment, and instruments external to the body, or passive means, are a possible part of the environment. I will also explain multistability by deriving it from the practice-ladenness of experience. I will rely on classical pragmatism in my argumentation.
Authors
- Juho Lindholm
Institutions
- University of Tartu (EE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Információs Társadalom
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xxiv.2024.3.3
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- European Commission
- Eesti Teadusagentuur
- European Regional Development Fund