Effect of Six Weeks’ Isometric Strength Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training on Gains in Strength, Power, and Speed in Male Academy Soccer Players

<b>Purpose:</b> Elevated sport-specific physical demands and congested fixture schedules leave little recovery time and augment fatigue levels in soccer players. Compared to traditional strength training (TST), isometric strength training (IST) may elicit comparative improvements in strength and performance-related parameters in soccer players, while reducing fatigue during periods of elevated competitive loading. <b>Methods:</b> This study compared the effects of 6-weeks' IST and TST on gains in strength, power, and speed in male academy soccer players. Eighteen athletes from a Football Association League 2 club's academy (age: 17.2 ± 0.6 years, height: 1.79 ± 0.06 m, body mass: 71.6 ± 3.4 kg) were randomly assigned to either the IST (<i>n</i> = 9) or TST (<i>n</i> = 9) group. Baseline and post-training testing included trap bar squat one-repetition maximum (1-RM), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), bilateral vertical countermovement jump (CMJ), and 10 m and 40 m linear sprints. Each group completed 12 training intervention sessions over six weeks, which comprised either an isometric or dynamic variation of a mid-thigh (clean) pull, split squat, and hip thrust. <b>Results:</b> Results indicated no group × time interaction effect on trap bar squat 1-RM (<i>p</i> = .171, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.107), IMTP peak force (<i>p</i> = .478, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.039), CMJ jump height (JH; <i>p</i> = .463, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.028), CMJ peak power (PP; <i>p</i> = .868, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.001), 10 m acceleration (<i>p</i> = .074, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.186), or sprint velocity (<i>p</i> = .348, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.058). However, there were main effects of time on trap bar squat 1-RM (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.634), CMJ JH (<i>p</i> = .031, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.255) and sprint velocity (<i>p</i> = .012, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.324). <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, IST is just as effective as TST in improving (or maintaining) strength, power, and speed during fixture-congested schedules in men's academy soccer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2488843
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Six Weeks’ Isometric Strength Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training on Gains in Strength, Power, and Speed in Male Academy Soccer Players

Luke Bailey, Robert M. Erskine, George Farrell, Joe Phillips et al.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effect of Six Weeks’ Isometric Strength Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training on Gains in Strength, Power, and Speed in Male Academy Soccer Players

Luke Bailey, Robert M. Erskine, George Farrell, Joe Phillips, Stephen J. McQuilliam
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> Elevated sport-specific physical demands and congested fixture schedules leave little recovery time and augment fatigue levels in soccer players. Compared to traditional strength training (TST), isometric strength training (IST) may elicit comparative improvements in strength and performance-related parameters in soccer players, while reducing fatigue during periods of elevated competitive loading. <b>Methods:</b> This study compared the effects of 6-weeks' IST and TST on gains in strength, power, and speed in male academy soccer players. Eighteen athletes from a Football Association League 2 club's academy (age: 17.2 ± 0.6 years, height: 1.79 ± 0.06 m, body mass: 71.6 ± 3.4 kg) were randomly assigned to either the IST (<i>n</i> = 9) or TST (<i>n</i> = 9) group. Baseline and post-training testing included trap bar squat one-repetition maximum (1-RM), isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), bilateral vertical countermovement jump (CMJ), and 10 m and 40 m linear sprints. Each group completed 12 training intervention sessions over six weeks, which comprised either an isometric or dynamic variation of a mid-thigh (clean) pull, split squat, and hip thrust. <b>Results:</b> Results indicated no group × time interaction effect on trap bar squat 1-RM (<i>p</i> = .171, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.107), IMTP peak force (<i>p</i> = .478, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.039), CMJ jump height (JH; <i>p</i> = .463, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.028), CMJ peak power (PP; <i>p</i> = .868, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.001), 10 m acceleration (<i>p</i> = .074, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.186), or sprint velocity (<i>p</i> = .348, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.058). However, there were main effects of time on trap bar squat 1-RM (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.634), CMJ JH (<i>p</i> = .031, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.255) and sprint velocity (<i>p</i> = .012, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.324). <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, IST is just as effective as TST in improving (or maintaining) strength, power, and speed during fixture-congested schedules in men's academy soccer.

Research Quarterly for Exercise and SportVol. 96(4)
Manchester City Football Club (GB), University College London (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.