Pragmatics and cultural institutions

Abstract This article presents a pragmatic analysis of the different types of interrogatives used in the tweets posted on the official accounts of five Spanish cultural institutions (museums and film archives) and how these form part of these institutions’ strategies to foster interactivity in their online communications. To this end, the work aims to determine: (a) what types of interrogatives appear most frequently; (b) identify where they appear in a tweet; and (c) how this affects their formulation and also their functions within the speech act set constituting the tweet. The corpus for analysis comprises 430 tweets collected using the T-Hoarder system during a single year, 2020. An examination of on one hand the flow of tweets (numbers of tweets, retweets, and replies) for each institution throughout the year of study and on the other, the numbers of interrogatives they employed suggests that interrogatives contribute to increased levels of interactivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23022.her
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatics and cultural institutions

María Isabel Hernández Toribio
Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Pragmatics and cultural institutions

María Isabel Hernández Toribio
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a pragmatic analysis of the different types of interrogatives used in the tweets posted on the official accounts of five Spanish cultural institutions (museums and film archives) and how these form part of these institutions’ strategies to foster interactivity in their online communications. To this end, the work aims to determine: (a) what types of interrogatives appear most frequently; (b) identify where they appear in a tweet; and (c) how this affects their formulation and also their functions within the speech act set constituting the tweet. The corpus for analysis comprises 430 tweets collected using the T-Hoarder system during a single year, 2020. An examination of on one hand the flow of tweets (numbers of tweets, retweets, and replies) for each institution throughout the year of study and on the other, the numbers of interrogatives they employed suggests that interrogatives contribute to increased levels of interactivity.

Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pragmatics and cultural institutions — María Isabel Hernández Toribio · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS