Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Warehouse Construction Systems Under Distinct End-of-Life Scenarios
There is an increasing demand to replace traditional construction techniques with more sustainable systems that can reduce environmental impacts. Emissions are typically assessed only in carbon dioxide and embodied energy terms, yet these metrics alone cannot fully capture the overall impact generated. This study provides a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of three steel warehouse projects with varying cladding systems: steel walls (SW), steel-clay brick walls (SClaW), and steel-concrete block walls (SConW). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology was used to assess the environmental impact of materials used during the whole life cycle. The study used the software program SimaPro (System for Integrated Environmental Assessment of Products) version 9.6.0.1, with data extracted from the international Ecoinvent database. ReCiPe Midpoint approach were adopted to assess potential impacts. The results indicate that the SW project under end-of-life Scenario 2—waste recycling—exhibited the lowest impacts across most categories, followed by the SConW and SClaW projects. The findings emphasize the environmental benefits of utilizing steel cladding systems over brick or concrete masonry and considering recycling as the end of life of the materials. Additionally, the study provides insights into the significance of material choices in minimizing environmental impact on human health, resource availability, and ecosystems.
Authors
- Paulo Cezar Vitório (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4109-0834)
- Moacir Kripka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1997-3414)
- Víctor Yepes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5488-6001)
- Fabio Onetta
Institutions
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Buildings
- Published
- 2025-04-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091445
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.60
Funders
- European Commission
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- European Regional Development Fund
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación