Uncertainty quantification for neural network potential foundation models

Abstract For neural network potentials (NNPs) to gain widespread use, researchers must be able to trust model outputs. However, the blackbox nature of neural networks and their inherent stochasticity are often deterrents, especially for foundation models trained over broad swaths of chemical space. Uncertainty information provided at the time of prediction can help reduce aversion to NNPs. In this work, we detail two uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. Readout ensembling, by finetuning the readout layers of an ensemble of foundation models, provides information about model uncertainty, while quantile regression, by replacing point predictions with distributional predictions, provides information about uncertainty within the underlying training data. We demonstrate our approach with the MACE-MP-0 model, applying UQ to the foundation model and a series of finetuned models. The uncertainties produced by the readout ensemble and quantile methods are demonstrated to be distinct measures by which the quality of the NNP output can be judged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Computational Materials
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-025-01572-y
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty quantification for neural network potential foundation models

Sutanay Choudhury, Michael Ka Ho Lee, Jesun Firoz, Jenna A. Bilbrey
12 citations
npj Computational Materials
Machine Learning in Materials Science
6.21
article

Uncertainty quantification for neural network potential foundation models

Sutanay Choudhury, Michael Ka Ho Lee, Jesun Firoz, Jenna A. Bilbrey
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract For neural network potentials (NNPs) to gain widespread use, researchers must be able to trust model outputs. However, the blackbox nature of neural networks and their inherent stochasticity are often deterrents, especially for foundation models trained over broad swaths of chemical space. Uncertainty information provided at the time of prediction can help reduce aversion to NNPs. In this work, we detail two uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. Readout ensembling, by finetuning the readout layers of an ensemble of foundation models, provides information about model uncertainty, while quantile regression, by replacing point predictions with distributional predictions, provides information about uncertainty within the underlying training data. We demonstrate our approach with the MACE-MP-0 model, applying UQ to the foundation model and a series of finetuned models. The uncertainties produced by the readout ensemble and quantile methods are demonstrated to be distinct measures by which the quality of the NNP output can be judged.

npj Computational MaterialsVol. 11(1)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Battelle, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
6.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.