The accessibility of general practice websites assessed by patients: a cross-sectional study

Most respondents found the website accessible, readable and well-organized. There are notable shortcomings in cultural sensitivity, currentness and interactivity. Areas for improvement include incorporating symbols, language options, displaying update date and the use of paragraphs, bold or colored words. In a study conducted in Flanders, most patients found healthcare websites easy to access, read, and navigate. However, the study highlighted significant gaps in cultural inclusivity, with only 40% of patients feeling the websites catered to a multicultural audience. Additionally, the websites lacked up-to-date content and interactive features. The study recommends improving user experience by incorporating multilingual options, clearly displaying update dates, and using visually distinct text elements such as symbols and colored words.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12629-5
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The accessibility of general practice websites assessed by patients: a cross-sectional study

Birgitte Schoenmakers, R Beckers
3 links
BMC Health Services Research
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

The accessibility of general practice websites assessed by patients: a cross-sectional study

Birgitte Schoenmakers, R Beckers
article en

Abstract

Most respondents found the website accessible, readable and well-organized. There are notable shortcomings in cultural sensitivity, currentness and interactivity. Areas for improvement include incorporating symbols, language options, displaying update date and the use of paragraphs, bold or colored words. In a study conducted in Flanders, most patients found healthcare websites easy to access, read, and navigate. However, the study highlighted significant gaps in cultural inclusivity, with only 40% of patients feeling the websites catered to a multicultural audience. Additionally, the websites lacked up-to-date content and interactive features. The study recommends improving user experience by incorporating multilingual options, clearly displaying update dates, and using visually distinct text elements such as symbols and colored words.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 25(1)
Department of Public Health (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The accessibility of general practice websites assessed by patients: a cross-sectional study — Birgitte Schoenmakers, R Beckers · BMC Health Services Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS