Monte Carlo quantification of organ doses and risks in chest X-ray projections

Background: X-ray imaging is a pivotal diagnostic tool that poses health risks from absorbed radiation doses. This study aimed to determine the variation in the effective dose between posterior–anterior (PA) and anterior–posterior (AP) projections and assess the impact of sex on these doses using the PCXMC simulation software. Methods: A Philips radiography machine and Piranha and Browser dosimeter kits were used to measure the entrance dose of a whole-body phantom. These doses were input into the PCXMC to calculate the effective doses for the organ/tissue. The measured data were used to calculate the risk associated with exposure using a linear no-threshold model. Results: The PA projections were associated with lower effective doses (0.003628 mSv) than the AP projections (0.008424 mSv). Sex comparisons showed no significant difference in effective doses due to uniform organ doses across sexes, except for the reproductive organs and weighted remainder, where shielding minimized radiation exposure. Risk calculation analysis revealed overarching trends, confirming the documented higher sensitivity in female patients and the predominant risk contributions from critical organs, such as the lungs. Conclusion: AP projections yield higher effective doses than PA projections; however, sex does not significantly affect organ dose estimation, suggesting that both projections can be used interchangeably with patient sex. Recommendations and methodological limitations are detailed in the Supplementary Information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/abhs.abhs_16_25
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monte Carlo quantification of organ doses and risks in chest X-ray projections

Wiam Elshami, Mohamed Abuzaid, Hussein M. Elmehdi, Krithikadevi Ramachandran
Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Monte Carlo quantification of organ doses and risks in chest X-ray projections

Wiam Elshami, Mohamed Abuzaid, Hussein M. Elmehdi, Krithikadevi Ramachandran
article en

Abstract

Background: X-ray imaging is a pivotal diagnostic tool that poses health risks from absorbed radiation doses. This study aimed to determine the variation in the effective dose between posterior–anterior (PA) and anterior–posterior (AP) projections and assess the impact of sex on these doses using the PCXMC simulation software. Methods: A Philips radiography machine and Piranha and Browser dosimeter kits were used to measure the entrance dose of a whole-body phantom. These doses were input into the PCXMC to calculate the effective doses for the organ/tissue. The measured data were used to calculate the risk associated with exposure using a linear no-threshold model. Results: The PA projections were associated with lower effective doses (0.003628 mSv) than the AP projections (0.008424 mSv). Sex comparisons showed no significant difference in effective doses due to uniform organ doses across sexes, except for the reproductive organs and weighted remainder, where shielding minimized radiation exposure. Risk calculation analysis revealed overarching trends, confirming the documented higher sensitivity in female patients and the predominant risk contributions from critical organs, such as the lungs. Conclusion: AP projections yield higher effective doses than PA projections; however, sex does not significantly affect organ dose estimation, suggesting that both projections can be used interchangeably with patient sex. Recommendations and methodological limitations are detailed in the Supplementary Information.

Advances in Biomedical and Health SciencesVol. 4(4)
University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.