Comparative Analysis between Input Dependent Key Logic Locking (IDKLL) and SARLock for SAT Resistant Logic Locking

Increased threats to intellectual property through reverse engineering and SAT attacks have encouraged securing digital circuits using various locking techniques. It is very essential to secure the circuits to avoid replication of circuits without authorization. This paper presents a comparative analysis between SARLock method and IDKLL method of logic locking against SAT attacks. It evaluates the effectiveness of IDKLL based on power consumption, area overhead and delay while increasing the security on attacks like brute force, reverse engineering, and SAT attacks. SARLock utilizes, XNOR and XOR gates to lock the circuit but introduces higher complexity. The IDKLL method uses input-dependent key mechanisms and K-map-based optimizations for logic locking. Performance comparison for the metrics like area, power, delay, and power-delay-product shows that the IDKLL method has more advantages and it is more reliable method for protecting the intellectual property of ICs,

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicacs65178.2025.10967711
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis between Input Dependent Key Logic Locking (IDKLL) and SARLock for SAT Resistant Logic Locking

Sonali Agrawal, M.A.Q. Siddiqui, Neha Bysani, Varshith Mallela
1 citations
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
2.27
article

Comparative Analysis between Input Dependent Key Logic Locking (IDKLL) and SARLock for SAT Resistant Logic Locking

Sonali Agrawal, M.A.Q. Siddiqui, Neha Bysani, Varshith Mallela
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Increased threats to intellectual property through reverse engineering and SAT attacks have encouraged securing digital circuits using various locking techniques. It is very essential to secure the circuits to avoid replication of circuits without authorization. This paper presents a comparative analysis between SARLock method and IDKLL method of logic locking against SAT attacks. It evaluates the effectiveness of IDKLL based on power consumption, area overhead and delay while increasing the security on attacks like brute force, reverse engineering, and SAT attacks. SARLock utilizes, XNOR and XOR gates to lock the circuit but introduces higher complexity. The IDKLL method uses input-dependent key mechanisms and K-map-based optimizations for logic locking. Performance comparison for the metrics like area, power, delay, and power-delay-product shows that the IDKLL method has more advantages and it is more reliable method for protecting the intellectual property of ICs,

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.