Legal Contract Analysis and Risk Assessment Using Pre-Trained Legal-T5 and Law-GPT

The need for effective solutions in reviewing, risk identification, and compliance management of complex legal contracts has remained a critical challenge. This research explores how modern machine learning models like Legal T5, and Law GPT can automate contract analysis and improve review accuracy. Legal T5 summarizes the complex legal documents while Law GPT captures the critical risks. K-Means clustering was used to improve the contract segmentation by grouping similar clauses for a structured risk assessment. Tested on the CUAD dataset, the system's text summarizing findings showed coherence and a strong semantic similarity of 0.78, ensuring that the final summaries retained significant legal importance. The model achieved an average precision of 0.85, recall of 0.77, and F1-score of 0.80 across various risk categories. The findings prove that Legal T5, along with clustering, improves contract analysis with the ability to provide a context and structure-aware summary with better identification of risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icicacs65178.2025.10968817
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Contract Analysis and Risk Assessment Using Pre-Trained Legal-T5 and Law-GPT

Manju Venugopalan, A. Poornima, K.V. Nagaraja
1 citations
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
3.13
article

Legal Contract Analysis and Risk Assessment Using Pre-Trained Legal-T5 and Law-GPT

Manju Venugopalan, A. Poornima, K.V. Nagaraja
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The need for effective solutions in reviewing, risk identification, and compliance management of complex legal contracts has remained a critical challenge. This research explores how modern machine learning models like Legal T5, and Law GPT can automate contract analysis and improve review accuracy. Legal T5 summarizes the complex legal documents while Law GPT captures the critical risks. K-Means clustering was used to improve the contract segmentation by grouping similar clauses for a structured risk assessment. Tested on the CUAD dataset, the system's text summarizing findings showed coherence and a strong semantic similarity of 0.78, ensuring that the final summaries retained significant legal importance. The model achieved an average precision of 0.85, recall of 0.77, and F1-score of 0.80 across various risk categories. The findings prove that Legal T5, along with clustering, improves contract analysis with the ability to provide a context and structure-aware summary with better identification of risks.

Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.