PTSA: Utilizing Transaction Prioritization to Enhance Confirmation Speed in the IOTA Network

With the rapid advancement of blockchain technology, a significant trend is the adoption of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) as an alternative to traditional chain-based architectures for organizing ledger records. Systems like IOTA, which are specially designed for the Internet of Things (Io'T), leverage DAG-based architectures to achieve greater scalability by enabling multiple attachment points in the ledger for new transactions while allowing these transactions to be added to the network without incurring any fees. To determine these attachment points, many tip selection algorithms commonly employ specific strategies on the DAG ledger. Transaction prioritization is not considered in the IOTA network, which becomes especially important when network bandwidth is limited. In this paper, we propose an optimization framework designed to integrate a priority level for critical or high-priority IoT transactions within the IOTA network. We evaluate our system using fully based on the official IOTA GitHub repository, which employs the currently operational IOTA node software (Hornet version), as part of the Chrysalis update (1.5). The experimental results show that higher-priority transactions in the proposed algorithm reach final confirmation in less time compared to the original IOTA system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/csicc65765.2025.10967412
Primary Topic
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PTSA: Utilizing Transaction Prioritization to Enhance Confirmation Speed in the IOTA Network

Ahmad Khonsari, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, Reza Sharifnia
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
article

PTSA: Utilizing Transaction Prioritization to Enhance Confirmation Speed in the IOTA Network

Ahmad Khonsari, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, Reza Sharifnia
article en

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of blockchain technology, a significant trend is the adoption of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) as an alternative to traditional chain-based architectures for organizing ledger records. Systems like IOTA, which are specially designed for the Internet of Things (Io'T), leverage DAG-based architectures to achieve greater scalability by enabling multiple attachment points in the ledger for new transactions while allowing these transactions to be added to the network without incurring any fees. To determine these attachment points, many tip selection algorithms commonly employ specific strategies on the DAG ledger. Transaction prioritization is not considered in the IOTA network, which becomes especially important when network bandwidth is limited. In this paper, we propose an optimization framework designed to integrate a priority level for critical or high-priority IoT transactions within the IOTA network. We evaluate our system using fully based on the official IOTA GitHub repository, which employs the currently operational IOTA node software (Hornet version), as part of the Chrysalis update (1.5). The experimental results show that higher-priority transactions in the proposed algorithm reach final confirmation in less time compared to the original IOTA system.

University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PTSA: Utilizing Transaction Prioritization to Enhance Confirmation Speed in the IOTA Network — Ahmad Khonsari, Seyyed Ali Aghamiri, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS