Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence

Using machine-learning-based measures for political and climate risks derived from corporate conference calls, we discover a link between the two in a large sample of US firms from 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that firms facing higher political risk are more susceptible to climate risk. Additionally, we find that a firm's emitter category industry classification and exposure to environmental litigation can exacerbate this situation, while managerial ability helps reduce the impact. Furthermore, political lobbying and donations effectively check corporate climate risk, but only under non-partisan conditions. Importantly, our findings are robust to concerns of reverse causality, sample selection bias, and measurement errors. • Political risk amplifies climate risk for U.S. firms. • High political risk makes firms in polluting industries even more vulnerable to climate risk. • Non-partisan lobbying and donations help firms lessen the impact of political risk on climate risk. • Efficient managers can weaken the link between political risk and climate risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104282
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence

Ramzi Benkraiem, Hamdi Ben‐Nasr, Abdullah Al Masum, Shabeen Asfar Basha
3 citations
International Review of Financial Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
article

Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence

Ramzi Benkraiem, Hamdi Ben‐Nasr, Abdullah Al Masum, Shabeen Asfar Basha
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Using machine-learning-based measures for political and climate risks derived from corporate conference calls, we discover a link between the two in a large sample of US firms from 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that firms facing higher political risk are more susceptible to climate risk. Additionally, we find that a firm's emitter category industry classification and exposure to environmental litigation can exacerbate this situation, while managerial ability helps reduce the impact. Furthermore, political lobbying and donations effectively check corporate climate risk, but only under non-partisan conditions. Importantly, our findings are robust to concerns of reverse causality, sample selection bias, and measurement errors. • Political risk amplifies climate risk for U.S. firms. • High political risk makes firms in polluting industries even more vulnerable to climate risk. • Non-partisan lobbying and donations help firms lessen the impact of political risk on climate risk. • Efficient managers can weaken the link between political risk and climate risk.

International Review of Financial AnalysisVol. 104
Johnson C. Smith University (US), Audencia Business School (FR), Qatar University (QA)
Qatar University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence — Ramzi Benkraiem, Hamdi Ben‐Nasr, et al. · International Review of Financial Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS