Integrated Dispatching Model for Power System Incorporating Multiple Modules

The widespread integration of renewable energy presents significant challenges for power system scheduling. Traditional power system scheduling is mainly based on the concept of “coordinating on a multi-time-level and gradually refining at each level,” using a sequential scheduling framework. However, with the growing integration of renewable energy, the uncertainty in power systems has significantly increased, leading to severe issues such as conflicts in the coordination between different modules. This paper first introduces the scheduling framework of the traditional sequential scheduling model. Then, addressing the problems of module coordination and insufficient flexibility, an integrated multi-time-scale scheduling model is proposed. This model combines day-ahead and intraday scheduling models, optimizing decision variables including unit start/shut states, operation points, and reserves simultaneously to maximize the collaborative potential between different scheduling modules. After linearization, the proposed model is converted into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, which can be solved directly using commercial optimization solvers. Finally, case analyses demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed integrated model compared to the traditional sequential scheduling model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eect64505.2025.10966993
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Dispatching Model for Power System Incorporating Multiple Modules

Zihan Wang, Chang Xu, Jialiang Wang, Mingqiang Wang et al.
Power Systems and Technologies
article

Integrated Dispatching Model for Power System Incorporating Multiple Modules

Zihan Wang, Chang Xu, Jialiang Wang, Mingqiang Wang, Yizhe Zhang, Feng-Bin Sun
article en

Abstract

The widespread integration of renewable energy presents significant challenges for power system scheduling. Traditional power system scheduling is mainly based on the concept of “coordinating on a multi-time-level and gradually refining at each level,” using a sequential scheduling framework. However, with the growing integration of renewable energy, the uncertainty in power systems has significantly increased, leading to severe issues such as conflicts in the coordination between different modules. This paper first introduces the scheduling framework of the traditional sequential scheduling model. Then, addressing the problems of module coordination and insufficient flexibility, an integrated multi-time-scale scheduling model is proposed. This model combines day-ahead and intraday scheduling models, optimizing decision variables including unit start/shut states, operation points, and reserves simultaneously to maximize the collaborative potential between different scheduling modules. After linearization, the proposed model is converted into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, which can be solved directly using commercial optimization solvers. Finally, case analyses demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed integrated model compared to the traditional sequential scheduling model.

Shandong University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Power Systems and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrated Dispatching Model for Power System Incorporating Multiple Modules — Zihan Wang, Chang Xu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS