Encouraging Vernacular Democracy

Abstract Today, some scholars use the term “dialogical democracy” to denote a highly participatory, egalitarian, and pragmatic form of politics that occurs when people with different beliefs and social backgrounds meet, propound, and launch collective actions through open disagreements, rebuttals, negotiations, and counterproposals. During the long process of forging a consensus, the participants treat each other’s rights to speak, question, disagree, and propose alternatives as inviolable; and they eschew the formal separation the roles of decision-makers and subordinates. In hopes of fomenting change in American society, a group of graduate students at the University of California, Berkeley, used a similar participatory and egalitarian mode of decision-making (as opposed to a formally hierarchical style of management) when coediting one of the first issues of New Political Science in the early 1980s. That short-lived experiment illustrates both the practical inconveniences of participatory democracy as well as its potential contributions to the education of citizens.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New Political Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/07393148-11699545
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encouraging Vernacular Democracy

Cyrus Ernesto Zirakzadeh
1 citations
New Political Science
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
38.00
article

Encouraging Vernacular Democracy

Cyrus Ernesto Zirakzadeh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Today, some scholars use the term “dialogical democracy” to denote a highly participatory, egalitarian, and pragmatic form of politics that occurs when people with different beliefs and social backgrounds meet, propound, and launch collective actions through open disagreements, rebuttals, negotiations, and counterproposals. During the long process of forging a consensus, the participants treat each other’s rights to speak, question, disagree, and propose alternatives as inviolable; and they eschew the formal separation the roles of decision-makers and subordinates. In hopes of fomenting change in American society, a group of graduate students at the University of California, Berkeley, used a similar participatory and egalitarian mode of decision-making (as opposed to a formally hierarchical style of management) when coediting one of the first issues of New Political Science in the early 1980s. That short-lived experiment illustrates both the practical inconveniences of participatory democracy as well as its potential contributions to the education of citizens.

New Political ScienceVol. 47(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
38.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Encouraging Vernacular Democracy — Cyrus Ernesto Zirakzadeh · New Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS