Critical Political Science from the Age of Nixon to the Epoch of Trump

Abstract Within the American Political Science Association (APSA) as well as most American political science departments, the origins and operations of the Caucus for a New Political Science (CNPS) since 1967–69 often are dismissed as antiscientific, insignificant, or unprofessional. However, these reactions misrepresent how the Caucus and its members have developed more critical, innovative, and pragmatic approaches to both politics and political science for over five decades, which often are highlighted in its journal, New Political Science. The CNPS continues to critically reexamine the workings of academic analysis by political scientists around the world. the discipline’s limited impact on politics and policy in the United States, and the growing illiberal turn in American democracy. Caucus members still resist the conformist apolitical tendencies of mainstream American political science training, as it is framed around APSA conferences and publications, and contest how common professional practices in the discipline advance narrow interests favored by rigid state bureaucracies more than the diverse values of free, sovereign democratic citizens.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New Political Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/07393148-11699555
Primary Topic
Political Science Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Political Science from the Age of Nixon to the Epoch of Trump

Timothy W. Luke
New Political Science
Political Science Research and Education
article

Critical Political Science from the Age of Nixon to the Epoch of Trump

Timothy W. Luke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Within the American Political Science Association (APSA) as well as most American political science departments, the origins and operations of the Caucus for a New Political Science (CNPS) since 1967–69 often are dismissed as antiscientific, insignificant, or unprofessional. However, these reactions misrepresent how the Caucus and its members have developed more critical, innovative, and pragmatic approaches to both politics and political science for over five decades, which often are highlighted in its journal, New Political Science. The CNPS continues to critically reexamine the workings of academic analysis by political scientists around the world. the discipline’s limited impact on politics and policy in the United States, and the growing illiberal turn in American democracy. Caucus members still resist the conformist apolitical tendencies of mainstream American political science training, as it is framed around APSA conferences and publications, and contest how common professional practices in the discipline advance narrow interests favored by rigid state bureaucracies more than the diverse values of free, sovereign democratic citizens.

New Political ScienceVol. 47(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Political Science Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.