Embracing Subjectivity in Affective Research: Naturalistic and Controlled Settings

This paper suggests cultivating and modeling individual variation in research on affect and emotion, emphasizing the importance of studying real-world contexts to reveal their individualized nature. We propose a new standard for study design using more flexible and context-aware methods that emphasize modeling of high-dimensional signal arrays within individuals and then inductively learning generalizations rather than presuming their existence. We compare laboratory and real-life settings for the study of affect and emotion and highlight opportunities for studying individual variation structured by context. We discuss current challenges and future directions therein and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary and international collaboration and leveraging new technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aciiw63320.2024.00035
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embracing Subjectivity in Affective Research: Naturalistic and Controlled Settings

Joanna Komoszyńska, Przemysław Kazienko, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Dominika Kunc et al.
2 citations
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
2.26
article

Embracing Subjectivity in Affective Research: Naturalistic and Controlled Settings

Joanna Komoszyńska, Przemysław Kazienko, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Dominika Kunc, Karen S. Quigley, Stanisław Saganowski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper suggests cultivating and modeling individual variation in research on affect and emotion, emphasizing the importance of studying real-world contexts to reveal their individualized nature. We propose a new standard for study design using more flexible and context-aware methods that emphasize modeling of high-dimensional signal arrays within individuals and then inductively learning generalizations rather than presuming their existence. We compare laboratory and real-life settings for the study of affect and emotion and highlight opportunities for studying individual variation structured by context. We discuss current challenges and future directions therein and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary and international collaboration and leveraging new technologies.

Northeastern University (US), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
National Science Foundation, Politechnika Wrocławska, National Institutes of Health, Army Research Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.