SeSaMe: A Framework to Simulate Self-Reported Ground Truth for Mental Health Sensing Studies

Advances in mobile and wearable technologies have enabled the potential to passively monitor a person's mental, behavioral, and affective health. These approaches typically rely on longitudinal self-reported outcomes, e.g., depression, stress, and anxiety, to train machine learning models. However, the continuous need to self-report various internal states adds a significant burden on the participants, often resulting in attrition, missing labels, or insincere responses. In this work, we introduce the Scale Scores Simulation using Mental Models (SeSaMe) framework to alleviate participants' burden in digital mental health studies. By leveraging pre-trained large language models (LLMs), SeSaMe enables the simulation of participants' responses on psychological scales. In SeSaMe, researchers can prompt LLMs with information on participants' internal behav-ioral dispositions, enabling LLMs to construct mental models of participants to simulate their responses on psychological scales. As part of the framework, we provide four evaluation metrics to assess the effectiveness of the simulated responses. We demonstrate an application of SeSaMe, where we use GPT-4 to simulate responses on one scale using responses from another as behavioral information. We use SeSaMe's evaluation metrics to assess the alignment between human and SeSaMe-simulated responses to psychological scales. Then, we present multiple experiments to inspect the utility of SeSaMe-simulated responses as ground truth in training machine-learning models by replicating established depression and anxiety screening tasks with passive sensing data from a previous study. Our results indicate SeSaMe to be a promising approach, but its alignment may vary across scales and specific prediction objectives. We also observed that model performance with simulated data was on par with using the real data for training in most evaluation scenarios. We conclude by discussing the potential implications of SeSaMe in addressing some challenges with ground-truth collection in passive sensing studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/acii63134.2024.00031
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SeSaMe: A Framework to Simulate Self-Reported Ground Truth for Mental Health Sensing Studies

Varun Mishra, Vedant Das Swain, Akshat Choube
3 citations
Mental Health Research Topics
1.52
article

SeSaMe: A Framework to Simulate Self-Reported Ground Truth for Mental Health Sensing Studies

Varun Mishra, Vedant Das Swain, Akshat Choube
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Advances in mobile and wearable technologies have enabled the potential to passively monitor a person's mental, behavioral, and affective health. These approaches typically rely on longitudinal self-reported outcomes, e.g., depression, stress, and anxiety, to train machine learning models. However, the continuous need to self-report various internal states adds a significant burden on the participants, often resulting in attrition, missing labels, or insincere responses. In this work, we introduce the Scale Scores Simulation using Mental Models (SeSaMe) framework to alleviate participants' burden in digital mental health studies. By leveraging pre-trained large language models (LLMs), SeSaMe enables the simulation of participants' responses on psychological scales. In SeSaMe, researchers can prompt LLMs with information on participants' internal behav-ioral dispositions, enabling LLMs to construct mental models of participants to simulate their responses on psychological scales. As part of the framework, we provide four evaluation metrics to assess the effectiveness of the simulated responses. We demonstrate an application of SeSaMe, where we use GPT-4 to simulate responses on one scale using responses from another as behavioral information. We use SeSaMe's evaluation metrics to assess the alignment between human and SeSaMe-simulated responses to psychological scales. Then, we present multiple experiments to inspect the utility of SeSaMe-simulated responses as ground truth in training machine-learning models by replicating established depression and anxiety screening tasks with passive sensing data from a previous study. Our results indicate SeSaMe to be a promising approach, but its alignment may vary across scales and specific prediction objectives. We also observed that model performance with simulated data was on par with using the real data for training in most evaluation scenarios. We conclude by discussing the potential implications of SeSaMe in addressing some challenges with ground-truth collection in passive sensing studies.

Northeastern University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Mental Health Research Topics
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.