Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Effective Credit Card Fraud Detection

This study studies Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for tracing credit card fraud, including random forest, logistic regression, and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), using a dataset of 287,807 transactions from European cardholders. To resolve data imbalance, resampling was done after applying data preparation techniques. Ten balanced subsets of data were produced by undersampling the majority (non-fraud) class, each of which concentrated on a different aspect of the majority. These subsets were used to train individual models, and predictions were produced by majority voting. For comparison, models were trained using the original unbalanced data in addition to resampling. Accuracy, recall, precision, F1 scores, ROC-AVC scores, and a practical business assessment to determine their practical relevance were among the evaluation criteria. Logistic regression, trained on unbalanced data, achieved a ROC-AUC of 99.06% with transparent decision-making, outperforming models trained on balanced subsets, which, despite high AUC-ROC scores, suffered low precision and reduced practical reliability in fraud detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icsc64553.2025.10968893
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Effective Credit Card Fraud Detection

Pallavi Saxena
1 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
2.48
article

Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Effective Credit Card Fraud Detection

Pallavi Saxena
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study studies Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for tracing credit card fraud, including random forest, logistic regression, and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), using a dataset of 287,807 transactions from European cardholders. To resolve data imbalance, resampling was done after applying data preparation techniques. Ten balanced subsets of data were produced by undersampling the majority (non-fraud) class, each of which concentrated on a different aspect of the majority. These subsets were used to train individual models, and predictions were produced by majority voting. For comparison, models were trained using the original unbalanced data in addition to resampling. Accuracy, recall, precision, F1 scores, ROC-AVC scores, and a practical business assessment to determine their practical relevance were among the evaluation criteria. Logistic regression, trained on unbalanced data, achieved a ROC-AUC of 99.06% with transparent decision-making, outperforming models trained on balanced subsets, which, despite high AUC-ROC scores, suffered low precision and reduced practical reliability in fraud detection.

Houston Independent School District (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Effective Credit Card Fraud Detection — Pallavi Saxena · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS