Modeling Perceived Sleep Quality Through Objective and Subjective Data

People have different perceptions of what is a good sleep, and assessments of sleep quality are heavily influenced by personal habits. Therefore, there is a considerable gap between what is objectively measured as good sleep with respect to what is, instead, subjectively perceived as such. Polysomnography (PSG) has long been the gold standard for sleep analysis, providing detailed insights into sleep architecture. However, its cumbersome setup limits the ability to capture longitudinal patterns, required to understand what influences perceived sleep quality. Wearable sleep-tracking devices hold the potential to bridge this gap by enabling continuous monitoring over extended periods, gradually adapting to individual personal variations. To fully leverage this capability, it is essential to incorporate predictive features into machine learning (ML) models that account for past personalized trends, including both physiological, subjective, and contextual information. In this study, we monitored a cohort of 23 workers for 30 days, collecting data from wearable devices and daily questionnaires. The best ML model, evaluated on a nested leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, achieved a median ROC AUC of 0.85 employing both absolute and trend-based features. Our preliminary research showcases that the performance of ML models in predicting subjective sleep quality can be significantly enhanced by taking into account personalized health trajectories over time, allowing for more effective longitudinal monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aciiw63320.2024.00046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Perceived Sleep Quality Through Objective and Subjective Data

Michal Bechný, Davide Marzorati, Francesca Dalia Faraci, Radoslava Švihrová et al.
1 citations
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
0.51
article

Modeling Perceived Sleep Quality Through Objective and Subjective Data

Michal Bechný, Davide Marzorati, Francesca Dalia Faraci, Radoslava Švihrová, Silvia Santini, Andrew Dei Rossi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

People have different perceptions of what is a good sleep, and assessments of sleep quality are heavily influenced by personal habits. Therefore, there is a considerable gap between what is objectively measured as good sleep with respect to what is, instead, subjectively perceived as such. Polysomnography (PSG) has long been the gold standard for sleep analysis, providing detailed insights into sleep architecture. However, its cumbersome setup limits the ability to capture longitudinal patterns, required to understand what influences perceived sleep quality. Wearable sleep-tracking devices hold the potential to bridge this gap by enabling continuous monitoring over extended periods, gradually adapting to individual personal variations. To fully leverage this capability, it is essential to incorporate predictive features into machine learning (ML) models that account for past personalized trends, including both physiological, subjective, and contextual information. In this study, we monitored a cohort of 23 workers for 30 days, collecting data from wearable devices and daily questionnaires. The best ML model, evaluated on a nested leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, achieved a median ROC AUC of 0.85 employing both absolute and trend-based features. Our preliminary research showcases that the performance of ML models in predicting subjective sleep quality can be significantly enhanced by taking into account personalized health trajectories over time, allowing for more effective longitudinal monitoring.

University of Bern (CH), University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.