A Fast Numerical Approach Toward AC Loss and Critical Current of Large-Scale Stacked Cables

Evaluating AC loss and critical current of large-scale high-temperature superconducting (HTS) cables is one of the fundamental studies towards fusion magnet applications. In this paper, a new and fast numerical method is proposed for the calculation of AC loss of large-scale stacked cables. The model consists of the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$J$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation and the fast multipole method (FMM). Compared to the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation, the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$J$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation exhibits better nonlinear convergence. Meanwhile, the FMM successfully reduces the storage and computational complexity of dense matrices from <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N^{2})$</tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(N)$</tex-math></inline-formula>. This paper compares the computational performance of three models through the analysis of the AC loss of a Rutherford cable consisting of 10 quasi-isotropic strands. The models considered are the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$A$</tex-math></inline-formula> formulation, the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$J$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation without FMM, and the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$J$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation with FMM. The results show that the computational performance of the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$J$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation with the FMM is significantly better than that of both the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$A$</tex-math></inline-formula> formulation and the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$J$</tex-math></inline-formula> integral formulation without FMM. Furthermore, this model can also be used for the evaluation of the critical current of the Rutherford cable.