Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): Randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis

The international literature, especially in North America and Europe, has shown that the use of midline catheters and long peripheral intravenous catheters have similarities regarding greater safety and lower risk of complications. The superiority related to the midline catheter in terms of the time of uncomplicated use in patients in need of peripherally appropriate solutions, but with high cost, is highlighted. The use of these devices remains incipient in Latin America, especially in Brazilian public institutions, requiring studies to evaluate evidence on the use and costs of these technologies in this specific population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05884294.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319587
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): Randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis

Marina Junges, Leandro Augusto Hansel, Arlene Gonçalves Dos Santos Fernandes, Eneida Rejane Rabelo et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
article

Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): Randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis

Marina Junges, Leandro Augusto Hansel, Arlene Gonçalves Dos Santos Fernandes, Eneida Rejane Rabelo, Tiago Oliveira Teixeira, Rodrigo do Nascimento Ceratti, Ivana Duarte Brum, Carolina Geske Saline
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The international literature, especially in North America and Europe, has shown that the use of midline catheters and long peripheral intravenous catheters have similarities regarding greater safety and lower risk of complications. The superiority related to the midline catheter in terms of the time of uncomplicated use in patients in need of peripherally appropriate solutions, but with high cost, is highlighted. The use of these devices remains incipient in Latin America, especially in Brazilian public institutions, requiring studies to evaluate evidence on the use and costs of these technologies in this specific population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05884294.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.