Midline catheter (10 cm) versus long peripheral intravenous catheter (6.4 cm): Randomized clinical trial protocol with economic analysis
The international literature, especially in North America and Europe, has shown that the use of midline catheters and long peripheral intravenous catheters have similarities regarding greater safety and lower risk of complications. The superiority related to the midline catheter in terms of the time of uncomplicated use in patients in need of peripherally appropriate solutions, but with high cost, is highlighted. The use of these devices remains incipient in Latin America, especially in Brazilian public institutions, requiring studies to evaluate evidence on the use and costs of these technologies in this specific population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT05884294.
Authors
- Marina Junges
- Leandro Augusto Hansel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9580-9085)
- Arlene Gonçalves Dos Santos Fernandes
- Eneida Rejane Rabelo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4374-4419)
- Tiago Oliveira Teixeira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5162-1868)
- Rodrigo do Nascimento Ceratti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-3878)
- Ivana Duarte Brum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-3652)
- Carolina Geske Saline
Institutions
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-04-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319587
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.52